Converting Likert Scales Into Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales(Bars) For The Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness For Formative Purposes

被引:0
作者
Matosas-Lopez, Luis [1 ]
Leguey-Galan, Santiago [1 ]
Miguel Doncel-Pedrera, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Mostoles, Spain
关键词
Student evaluation of teaching; SET; Teacher evaluation; Higher education; Formative evaluation; Behavioral episodes; STUDENT-EVALUATIONS; EXPECTATION SCALES; RESPONSE BIASES; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DETERMINANTS; LENIENCY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Likert scales traditionally used in student evaluations of teaching (SET) suffer from several shortcomings, including psychometric deficiencies or ambiguity problems in the interpretation of the results. Assessment instruments with Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) offer an alternative to Likert-type questionnaires. This paper describes the construction of an appraisal tool with BARS generated with the participation of 974 students and 15 teachers. The resulting instrument eliminates ambiguity in the interpretation of results and gives objectivity to the evaluation due to the use of unequivocal behavioral examples in the final scale. However, BARS methodology presents the problem of losing behavioral information during scale construction. The BARS methodology presented by the authors introduces an additional step to the traditional procedure, which significantly reduces the loss of information during the scale construction. The authors conclude that the qualitative approach of the proposed instrument facilitates the application of the formative function of the evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]   Student evaluation of teaching: the use of best-worst scaling [J].
Huybers, Twan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (04) :496-513
[32]  
Kell H.H., 2017, ETS Research Reports Series, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/ETS2.12152
[33]   Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires [J].
Kember, David ;
Leung, Doris Y. P. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 33 (04) :341-353
[34]   A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF STUDIES COMPARING BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING-SCALES (BARS) AND OTHER RATING FORMATS [J].
KINGSTROM, PO ;
BASS, AR .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 34 (02) :263-289
[35]   AGE AND TEACHING PERFORMANCE [J].
KINNEY, DP ;
SMITH, SP .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 63 (03) :282-302
[36]  
Klieger D., 2018, ETS Research Report N˚RR-18-24, DOI DOI 10.1002/ETS2.12210
[37]   THE STRUCTURED EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: NARRATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH LITERATURE [J].
Levashina, Julia ;
Hartwell, Christopher J. ;
Morgeson, Frederick P. ;
Campion, Michael A. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (01) :241-293
[38]  
Little O., 2009, PRACTICAL GUIDE EVAL
[39]  
Lu YL, 2018, J UNIV TEACH LEARN P, V15
[40]   Measuring Team Performance in Complex and Dynamic Military Environments: The SPOTLITE Method [J].
MacMillan, Jean ;
Entin, Eileen B. ;
Morley, Rebecca ;
Bennett, Winston, Jr. .
MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 25 (03) :266-279