Converting Likert Scales Into Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales(Bars) For The Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness For Formative Purposes

被引:0
作者
Matosas-Lopez, Luis [1 ]
Leguey-Galan, Santiago [1 ]
Miguel Doncel-Pedrera, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Mostoles, Spain
关键词
Student evaluation of teaching; SET; Teacher evaluation; Higher education; Formative evaluation; Behavioral episodes; STUDENT-EVALUATIONS; EXPECTATION SCALES; RESPONSE BIASES; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DETERMINANTS; LENIENCY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Likert scales traditionally used in student evaluations of teaching (SET) suffer from several shortcomings, including psychometric deficiencies or ambiguity problems in the interpretation of the results. Assessment instruments with Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) offer an alternative to Likert-type questionnaires. This paper describes the construction of an appraisal tool with BARS generated with the participation of 974 students and 15 teachers. The resulting instrument eliminates ambiguity in the interpretation of results and gives objectivity to the evaluation due to the use of unequivocal behavioral examples in the final scale. However, BARS methodology presents the problem of losing behavioral information during scale construction. The BARS methodology presented by the authors introduces an additional step to the traditional procedure, which significantly reduces the loss of information during the scale construction. The authors conclude that the qualitative approach of the proposed instrument facilitates the application of the formative function of the evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :143-156
[2]   Teaching quality and student satisfaction: nexus or simulacrum? [J].
Beecham, Rod .
LONDON REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2009, 7 (02) :135-146
[3]   BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATION SCALES VERSUS SUMMATED SCALES - FAIRER COMPARISON [J].
BERNARDIN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 62 (04) :422-427
[4]   RECOMPARISON OF BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATION SCALES TO SUMMATED SCALES [J].
BERNARDIN, HJ ;
ALVARES, KM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 61 (05) :564-570
[5]   Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching [J].
Boring, Anne .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 145 :27-41
[6]   BEHAVIOR-BASED VERSUS TRAIT-ORIENTED PERFORMANCE RATINGS - EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
BORMAN, WC ;
DUNNETTE, MD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 60 (05) :561-565
[7]   VIEW OF WHAT CAN HAPPEN WHEN BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATION SCALES ARE DEVELOPED IN ONE SETTING AND USED IN ANOTHER [J].
BORMAN, WC ;
VALLON, WR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 59 (02) :197-201
[8]   Evaluating students' evaluations of professors [J].
Braga, Michela ;
Paccagnella, Marco ;
Pellizzari, Michele .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2014, 41 :71-88
[9]   EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF RELATIVE EFFECTS OF RATER RESPONSE BIASES ON 3 RATING SCALE FORMATS [J].
BURNASKA, RF ;
HOLLMANN, TD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 59 (03) :307-312
[10]   DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF BEHAVIORALLY BASED RATING SCALES [J].
CAMPBELL, JP ;
DUNNETTE, MD ;
ARVEY, RD ;
HELLERVI.LV .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 57 (01) :15-22