Effect of Dental Implant Diameter on Fatigue Performance. Part II: Failure Analysis

被引:43
作者
Shemtov-Yona, Keren [1 ]
Rittel, Daniel [2 ]
Machtei, Eli E. [1 ,3 ]
Levin, Liran [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Mech Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Periodontol, Sch Grad Dent, Haifa, Israel
关键词
stress concentration; scanning electron microscopy; implant design; striation; INTERFACE; STRENGTH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00476.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to perform fracture mode analysis for in vitro failed implants in order to evaluate the relation between the fracture mode obtained and the implants' fatigue behavior. Materials and Methods Eighty fractured dental implants were analyzed after being tested for fatigue performance. A macroscopic failure analysis was performed, which evaluated and located the fracture modes obtained, followed by a microscopic failure analysis comprising a detailed scanning electron microscopy (SEM) fractographic analysis. Results Four distinctive fracture loci were identified and macrofracture mode analysis was performed, showing that all 5-mm implants that fractured were fractured at the abutment neck and screw. In the 3.75-mm group, 44.4% were fractured at the implant neck and 55.5% at the implants second thread. Fifty-two percent of the 3.3-mm fractured implants had it at the implants second tread and 48% at the implants third thread. The implant's metallographic sections revealed that the different fracture loci were located where thin metal cross sections and sharp notches coexist. Using SEM, we were able to characterize the failure micromechanisms and fatigue characterization as transgranular fracture and arrays of secondary parallel microcracks at relatively low magnifications and classic fatigue striations at much higher magnifications. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that proper implant design is crucial to ensure long-term fatigue performance for dental implants. The combination of sharp notches (thread) and narrow metal cross section is quite deleterious for fatigue resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 184
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Anitua E, 2010, INT J PERIODONT REST, V30, P89
[2]  
Basten C H, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P522
[3]   Analyses of fractured implant fixture after prolonged implantation [J].
Choe, HC ;
Lee, JK ;
Chung, CH .
METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 10 (04) :327-335
[4]   Osseointegrated Implant Fracture: Causes and Treatment [J].
Gealh, Walter Cristiano ;
Mazzo, Valeria ;
Barbi, Francisco ;
Camarini, Edevaldo Tadeu .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (04) :499-503
[5]   Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs [J].
Khraisat, A ;
Stegaroiu, R ;
Nomura, S ;
Miyakawa, O .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 88 (06) :604-610
[6]  
Morgan M J, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P409
[7]   Nonlinear Stress Analysis of Titanium Implants by Finite Element Method [J].
Nagasawa, Sakae ;
Hayano, Keigo ;
Niino, Tooru ;
Yamakura, Kazunori ;
Yoshida, Takamitsu ;
Mizoguchi, Toshihide ;
Terashima, Nobuyosi ;
Tamura, Kaoru ;
Ito, Michio ;
Yagasaki, Hiroshi ;
Kubota, Osamu ;
Yoshimura, Masayuki .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (04) :633-639
[8]   An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design [J].
Norton, MR .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (04) :290-298
[9]   A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years -: IV.: Cantilever or extension FPDs [J].
Pjetursson, BE ;
Tan, K ;
Lang, NP ;
Brägger, U ;
Egger, M ;
Zwahlen, M .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (06) :667-676
[10]   Scanning Electron Microscopy Fractography Analysis of Fractured Hollow Implants [J].
Sbordone, Ludovico ;
Traini, Tonino ;
Caputi, Sergio ;
Scarano, Antonio ;
Bortolaia, Claudia ;
Piattelli, Adriano .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (02) :105-112