Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans

被引:419
作者
Berke, PR [1 ]
Conroy, MM
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01944360008976081
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
This article sets forth a set of six principles that define and operationalize the concept of sustainable development. Using these six principles, a sample of 30 comprehensive plans was evaluated to determine how well their policies support sustainable development. Findings indicate no significant differences in how extensively sustainability principles are supported between the plans that state an intention to integrate sustainable development and those that do not. In addition, these plans do not provide balanced support of all six sustainability principles, as they support some principles significantly more than others.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 33
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATL ENV POLICIES CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAINABLE COMMUNIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUST AM NEW CONS PRO
[5]  
Beatley T., 1998, ECOLOGY PLACE PLANNI
[6]  
Berke P R., 1996, J. Environ. Plan. Manage, V39, P79, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09640569612688, 10.1080/09640569612688]
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF STATE PLANNING MANDATES ON LOCAL-PLAN QUALITY [J].
BERKE, PR ;
FRENCH, SP .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1994, 13 (04) :237-250
[8]   Coercive and cooperative intergovernmental mandates: A comparative analysis of Florida and New Zealand environmental plans [J].
Berke, PR ;
Dixon, J ;
Ericksen, N .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1997, 24 (03) :451-468
[9]  
BURBY R, 1997, MAKING GOVT PLAN EXP
[10]  
Calthorpe P., 1993, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream