Energy resources' utilization in organic and conventional vineyards: Energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and biofuel production

被引:69
|
作者
Kavargiris, Stefanos E. [1 ]
Mamolos, Andreas P. [1 ]
Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A. [2 ]
Nikolaidou, Anna E. [1 ]
Kalburtji, Kiriaki L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr, Lab Ecol & Environm Protect, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr, Lab Agr Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2009年 / 33卷 / 09期
关键词
Bioethanol; Energy analysis; Greenhouse effect; Organic farming; Vitis vinifera L; APPLE PRODUCTION; FARMING SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; OLIVE; BIOETHANOL; FERTILIZER; BIOMASS; IMPACT; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.006
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
An energy analysis, in conventional and organic vineyards, combined with ethanol production and greenhouse gas emissions, is useful in evaluating present situation and deciding best management strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in the energy flow between organic and conventional vineyards in three locations, to calculate CO2, CH4 and N2O-emissions based on the used fossil energy and to explore if wine industry wastes can be used to extract bioethanol. The data were collected through personal interviews with farmers during 2004-2005. Eighteen farmers, who owned vineyards about 1 ha each, were randomly selected to participate in this study [(3 conventional and 3 organic) x 3 locations]. The means averaged over all locations for fertilizer application, plant protection products application, transportation, harvesting, labor, machinery, fuels, plant protections products and tools energy inputs, total energy inputs, outputs (grapes), outputs (grapes + shoots), grape yield, man hour, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher in conventional than in organic vineyards, while the opposite occurred for the pruning. Means averaged over two farming systems for harvesting, tools energy inputs, energy outputs (grapes), grape yield, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher at location A, followed by location C and location B. Finally, for irrigation, the means averaged over the two farming systems were significantly lower at location C. Greenhouse gas emissions were significant lower in organic than in conventional vineyards. The results show a clear response of energy inputs to energy outputs that resulted from the farming system and location. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy Evaluation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Reed Plant Pelletizing and Utilization as Solid Biofuel
    Jasinskas, Algirdas
    Streikus, Dionizas
    Sarauskis, Egidijus
    Palsauskas, Mecys
    Venslauskas, Kestutis
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (06)
  • [2] Variation of energy flow and greenhouse gas emissions in vineyards located in Natura 2000 sites
    Litskas, Vassilios D.
    Karaolis, Christodoulos S.
    Menexes, George C.
    Mamolos, Andreas P.
    Koutsos, Thomas M.
    Kalburtji, Kiriaki L.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 27 : 1 - 7
  • [3] DETERMINING THE ENERGY UTILIZATION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (GHG) OF QUINOA PRODUCTION
    Dilay, Yusuf
    Gokdogan, Osman
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (6B): : 7713 - 7722
  • [4] Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional grain crop production: Accounting for nutrient inflows
    Hoffman, Eric
    Cavigelli, Michel A.
    Camargo, Gustavo
    Ryan, Matthew
    Ackroyd, Victoria J.
    Richard, Tom L.
    Mirsky, Steven
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 89 - 96
  • [5] Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands
    Bos, Jules F. F. P.
    de Haan, Janjo
    Sukkel, Wijnand
    Schils, Rene L. M.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2014, 68 : 61 - 70
  • [6] Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional avocado orchards in Mexico
    Astier, Marta
    Merlin-Uribe, Yair
    Villamil-Echeverri, Laura
    Garciarreal, Alfredo
    Gavito, Mayra E.
    Masera, Omar R.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 43 : 281 - 287
  • [7] Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel
    de Souza, Simone Pereira
    Pacca, Sergio
    de Avila, Marcio Turra
    Borges, Jose Luiz B.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (11) : 2552 - 2561
  • [8] Energy inputs, outputs and greenhouse gas emissions in organic, integrated and conventional peach orchards
    Michos, Marios C.
    Mamolos, Andreas P.
    Menexes, George C.
    Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A.
    Tsirakoglou, Vasilios M.
    Kalburtji, Kiriaki L.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 13 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [9] Energy flow and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional sweet cherry orchards located in or close to Natura 2000 sites
    Litskas, Vassilios D.
    Mamolos, Andreas P.
    Kalburtji, Kiriaki L.
    Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A.
    Kiose-Kampasakali, Eleni
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (03): : 1302 - 1310
  • [10] Determination of Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Organic Almond Production in Turkey
    Baran, Mehmet Firat
    Eren, Omer
    Gokdogan, Osman
    Oguz, Halil Ibrahim
    ERWERBS-OBSTBAU, 2020, 62 (03): : 341 - 346