Low-Dose Nivolumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience

被引:14
作者
Zhao, Joseph J. [1 ]
Kumarakulasinghe, Nesaretnam Barr [2 ,3 ]
Muthu, Vaishnavi [2 ]
Lee, Matilda [2 ]
Walsh, Robert [2 ]
Low, Jia Li [2 ]
Choo, Joan [2 ]
Tan, Hon Lyn [2 ]
Chong, Wan Qin [2 ]
Ang, Yvonne [2 ]
Chan, Gloria [2 ]
Yong, Wei Peng [2 ]
Huang, Yiqing [2 ]
Ngoi, Natalie [2 ]
Wong, Alvin [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, 10 Med Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Canc Inst, Dept Haematol Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Nivolumab; Immunotherapy; Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor; THERAPY; DIAGNOSTICS; DATABASE; SAFETY; COST;
D O I
10.1159/000512000
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The approved doses of the single agent nivolumab - an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody - for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are 3 mg/kg and a 240-mg flat dose, despite efficacy shown at lower doses in earlier CheckMate trials. In view of financial constraints, the minimum dose of nivolumab required for efficacy remains a critical area of inquiry. Methods: A retrospective review of RCC patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment was conducted. Using the median cutoff of the maximum dose per body weight received, we investigated the effect of lower dosages on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse event-free survival (irAE-FS). Survival analysis was made by Kaplan-Meier, by uni- and multivariable Cox models, and by modeling the statistical interaction between dosages and survival. Results: 32 patients were recruited: 8 patients (25%) receiving first-line treatment and 24 (75%) receiving second-line treatment and beyond. A median split at 2.15 mg/kg yielded 16 patients in both the lower-dose (LD) and the higher-dose (HD) cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) demonstrated no difference in OS after adjustment for gender (HR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1.05, p = 0.054; favoring LD), as well as in PFS after adjustment for gender and concurrent radiation therapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.34, p = 0.210; favoring LD). No differences in ORR were observed (50.0 vs. 43.8%, p = 1.00, in the LD and the HD cohort, respectively). Immune-related phenomena were observed in the LD group, including pseudoprogression and increased all-grade immune-related toxicities (irAE-FS: HR = 1.72, 95% CI 0.48-6.14, p = 0.293; favoring HD). Iterative dichotomization of dosages showed no dose-OS or dose-irAE-FS relationship. Conclusion: Our study suggests no apparent reduction in efficacy when using a low-dosage nivolumab regimen. (c) 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 202
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Nivolumab dose selection: challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned for cancer immunotherapy [J].
Agrawal, Shruti ;
Feng, Yan ;
Roy, Amit ;
Kollia, Georgia ;
Lestini, Brian .
JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2016, 4
[2]   Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology [J].
Amorim, Leila D. A. F. ;
Cai, Jianwen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (01) :324-333
[3]   Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy [J].
Borcoman, E. ;
Kanjanapan, Y. ;
Champiat, S. ;
Kato, S. ;
Servois, V. ;
Kurzrock, R. ;
Goel, S. ;
Bedard, P. ;
Le Tourneau, C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (03) :385-396
[4]  
Buti Sebastiano, 2020, Cancer Treat Res Commun, V22, P100161, DOI 10.1016/j.ctarc.2019.100161
[5]   THE COST OF DICHOTOMIZATION [J].
COHEN, J .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 7 (03) :249-253
[6]  
Donskov F, 2018, ANN ONCOL, V29
[7]   Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Escudier, B. ;
Porta, C. ;
Schmidinger, M. ;
Rioux-Leclercq, N. ;
Bex, A. ;
Khoo, V. ;
Grunwald, V. ;
Gillessen, S. ;
Horwich, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (05) :706-720
[8]  
FDA, MOD DOS REG NIV
[9]   Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated Beyond Progression A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
George, Saby ;
Motzer, Robert J. ;
Hammers, Hans J. ;
Redman, Bruce G. ;
Kuzel, TimothyM. ;
Tykodi, Scott S. ;
Plimack, Elizabeth R. ;
Jiang, Joel ;
Waxman, Ian M. ;
Rini, Brian I. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (09) :1179-1186
[10]  
GRAMBSCH PM, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P515