Chemicals of concern in plastic toys

被引:75
作者
Aurisano, Nicolo [1 ]
Huang, Lei [2 ]
Canals, Llorenc Mila i [3 ]
Jolliet, Olivier [2 ]
Fantke, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Produktionstorvet 424, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] United Nations Environm Programme, Econ Div, 1 Rue Miollis, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
Human exposure; Hazard quotient; Child cancer risk; High-throughput screening; Chemical alternatives assessment; Prioritization; PROPERTY-PROPERTY RELATIONSHIP; BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; CHILDRENS PRODUCTS; FIELD EXPOSURE; BISPHENOL-A; NEAR-FIELD; FOOD; IMPACT; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2020.106194
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We present a list of Chemicals of Concern (CoCs) in plastic toys. We started from available studies reporting chemical composition of toys to group plastic materials, as well as to gather mass fractions and function of chemicals in these materials. Chemical emissions from plastic toys and subsequent human exposures were then estimated using a series of models and a coupled near-field and far-field exposure assessment framework. Comparing human doses with reference doses shows high Hazard Quotients of up to 387 and cancer risk calculated using cancer slope factors of up to 0.0005. Plasticizers in soft plastic materials show the highest risk, with 31 out of the 126 chemicals identified as CoCs, with sum of Hazard Quotients >1 or child cancer risk >10(-6). Our results indicate that a relevant amount of chemicals used in plastic toy materials may pose a non-negligible health risk to children, calling for more refined investigations and more human- and eco-friendly alternatives. The 126 chemicals identified as CoCs were compared with other existing regulatory prioritization lists. While some of our chemicals appear in other lists, we also identified additional priority chemicals that are not yet covered elsewhere and thus require further attention. We finally derive for all considered chemicals the maximum Acceptable Chemical Content (ACC) in the grouped toy plastic materials as powerful green chemistry tool to check whether chemical alternatives could create substantial risks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [21] Life cycle based alternatives assessment (LCAA) for chemical substitution
    Fantke, Peter
    Huang, Lei
    Overcash, Michael
    Griffing, Evan
    Jolliet, Olivier
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2020, 22 (18) : 6008 - 6024
  • [22] Toward effective use of REACH data for science and policy
    Fantke, Peter
    Aurisano, Nicolo
    Provoost, Jeroen
    Karamertzanis, Panagiotis G.
    Hauschild, Michael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 135
  • [23] Building a European exposure science strategy
    Fantke, Peter
    von Goetz, Natalie
    Schlueter, Urs
    Bessems, Jos
    Connolly, Alison
    Dudzina, Tatsiana
    Ahrens, Andreas
    Bridges, Jim
    Coggins, Marie A.
    Conrad, Andre
    Hanninen, Otto
    Heinemeyer, Gerhard
    Kephalopoulos, Stylianos
    McLachlan, Michael
    Meijster, Tim
    Poulsen, Veronique
    Rother, Dag
    Vermeire, Theo
    Viegas, Susana
    Vlaanderen, Jelle
    Jeddi, Maryam Zare
    Bruinen de Bruin, Yuri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 917 - 924
  • [24] Goods that are good enough: Introducing an absolute sustainability perspective for managing chemicals in consumer products
    Fantke, Peter
    Illner, Nicole
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2019, 15 : 91 - 97
  • [25] Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization
    Fantke, Peter
    Aylward, Lesa
    Bare, Jane
    Chiu, Weihsueh A.
    Dodson, Robin
    Dwyer, Robert
    Ernstoff, Alexi
    Howard, Brett
    Jantunen, Matti
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Judson, Richard
    Kirchhubel, Nienke
    Li, Dingsheng
    Miller, Aubrey
    Paoli, Greg
    Price, Paul
    Rhomberg, Lorenz
    Shen, Beverly
    Shin, Hyeong-Moo
    Teeguarden, Justin
    Vallero, Daniel
    Wambaugh, John
    Wetmore, Barbara A.
    Zaleski, Rosemary
    McKone, Thomas E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 126 (12)
  • [26] From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment
    Fantke, Peter
    Weber, Roland
    Scheringer, Martin
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACY, 2015, 1 : 1 - 8
  • [27] Coupled near-field and far-field exposure assessment framework for chemicals in consumer products
    Fantke, Peter
    Ernstoff, Alexi S.
    Huang, Lei
    Csiszar, Susan A.
    Jolliet, Olivier
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 94 : 508 - 518
  • [28] Towards development of a rapid and effective non-destructive testing strategy to identify brominated flame retardants in the plastics of consumer products
    Gallen, Christie
    Banks, Andrew
    Brandsma, Sicco
    Baduel, Christine
    Thai, Phong
    Eaglesham, Geoff
    Heffernan, Amy
    Leonards, Pim
    Bainton, Paul
    Mueller, Jochen F.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 491 : 255 - 265
  • [29] Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
    Geyer, Roland
    Jambeck, Jenna R.
    Law, Kara Lavender
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (07):
  • [30] Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment
    Greggs, William
    Burns, Thomas
    Egeghy, Peter
    Embry, Michelle R.
    Fantke, Peter
    Gaborek, Bonnie
    Heine, Lauren
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Lee, Carolyn
    Muir, Derek
    Plotzke, Kathy
    Rinkevich, Joseph
    Sunger, Neha
    Tanir, Jennifer Y.
    Whittaker, Margaret
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 (06) : 880 - 894