Explaining Differences Within and Between Countries in the Risk of Income Poverty and Severe Material Deprivation: Comparing Single and Multilevel Analyses

被引:21
作者
Verbunt, Pim [1 ]
Guio, Anne-Catherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Warmoesberg 26, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Luxembourg Inst Socioecon Res, Maison Sci Humaines, 11 Porte Sci, L-4366 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
Europe 2020 social exclusion target group; Income poverty; Severe material deprivation; Single-level and multilevel multinomial logistic regression model; Shapley decomposition; Social spending; WESTERN DEMOCRACIES; RELATIVE POVERTY; ECONOMIC-STRESS; WELFARE-STATE; INSTITUTIONS; EUROPE; DETERMINANTS; INEQUALITY; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-018-2021-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study investigates the differences between the risk factors of income poverty and severe material deprivation by assessing to what extent both indicators are subject to the same underlying household-level and country-level determinants. Given that these two indicators encompass the majority of the Europe 2020 social inclusion target group, it is crucial for policy makers to better know which determinants are effective in explaining the differences within and between countries in the risk of these two target components. We employ a series of single-level and multilevel logistic multinomial models to explain differences between those who suffer from income poverty only', from severe material deprivation only', from both problems and none. The comparative use of single-level and multilevel methods allow for the first time to confront the respective within and between-country explanatory power of both types of models. In addition to the usual econometric approach of identifying significant relationships, we employed the Shapley decomposition method to compare the relative contribution of independent variables at the household-level (i.e. work intensity, household education, household costs, socio-demographic variables) and country-level (i.e. size of social spending (total, in-cash, in-kind), pro-poorness of social benefits, median income levels and the unemployment rate) to within and between-country explained variance measures. We apply our method to the cross-sectional European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions for the year 2012.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 868
页数:42
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]  
Bosco B., 2016, DEMS WORKING PAPER S, V344
[12]   The welfare state and relative poverty in rich Western democracies, 1967-1997 [J].
Brady, D .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2005, 83 (04) :1329-1364
[13]   Nearly universal, but somewhat distinct: The feminization of poverty in affluent Western democracies, 1969-2000 [J].
Brady, David ;
Kall, Denise .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 37 (03) :976-1007
[14]  
Brady D, 2009, SOC FORCES, V88, P271
[15]  
Browne W.J., 2015, MCMC Estimation in MlwiN.
[16]  
Callens M, 2004, DTEW RES REPORT, V0457, P1
[17]   Income inequality games [J].
Charpentier, Arthur ;
Mussard, Stephane .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2011, 9 (04) :529-554
[18]  
Chzhen Y, 2014, CHILD POVERTY MAT DE, P723
[19]   Lone parents, poverty and policy in the European Union [J].
Chzhen, Yekaterina ;
Bradshaw, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 22 (05) :487-506
[20]   Varieties of poverty reduction: Inserting the poverty and social exclusion target into Europe 2020 [J].
Copeland, Paul ;
Daly, Mary .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 22 (03) :273-287