Rattus Psychologicus: Construction of preferences by self-stimulating rats

被引:23
作者
Breton, Yannick-Andre [1 ]
Marcus, James C. [2 ]
Shizgal, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Ctr Studies Behav Neurobiol, Grp Rech Neurobiol Comportementale, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Fordham Univ, Dept Psychol, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Reward; Intracranial self-stimulation; Measurement; Operant conditioning; Opportunity cost; Medial forebrain bundle; Decision making; Evaluability; SUBJECTIVE REWARD MAGNITUDE; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS DOPAMINE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; MELIORATION; INTENSITY; VARIABLES; EFFICACY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Behavioral economists have proposed that human preferences are constructed during their elicitation and are thus influenced by the elicitation procedure. For example, different preferences are expressed when options are encountered one at a time or concurrently. This phenomenon has been attributed to differences in the "evaluability" of a particular attribute when comparison to an option with a different value of this attribute is or is not available. Research on the preferences of laboratory animals has often been carried out by means of operant-conditioning methods. Formal treatments of operant behavior relate preferences to variables such as the strength and cost of reward but do not address the evaluability of these variables. Two experiments assessed the impact of procedural factors likely to alter the evaluability of an opportunity cost ("price"): the work time required for a rat to earn a train of rewarding electrical brain stimulation. The results support the notion that comparison between recently encountered prices is necessary to render the price variable highly evaluable. When price is held constant over many trials and test sessions, the evaluability of this variable appears to decline. implications are discussed for the design of procedures for estimating subjective reward strengths and costs in operant-conditioning experiments aimed at characterizing, identifying and understanding neural circuitry underlying evaluation and choice. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 91
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Statist. Sci., DOI [10.1214/ss/1177013815, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013815]
[2]   Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Prelec, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (01) :73-105
[3]   The Reinforcement Mountain: Allocation of Behavior as a Function of the Rate and Intensity of Rewarding Brain Stimulation [J].
Arvanitogiannis, Andreas ;
Shizgal, Peter .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 122 (05) :1126-1138
[4]   A MICROCOMPUTER-BASED METHOD FOR PHYSIOLOGICALLY INTERPRETABLE MEASUREMENT OF THE REWARDING EFFICACY OF BRAIN-STIMULATION [J].
CAMPBELL, KA ;
EVANS, G ;
GALLISTEL, CR .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 35 (03) :395-403
[5]  
COMMONS ML, 1988, BIOL DETERMINANTS RE
[6]   Employing labor-supply theory to measure the reward value of electrical brain stimulation [J].
Conover, KL ;
Shizgal, P .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 52 (02) :283-304
[7]   Operant tempo varies with reinforcement rate: implications for measurement of reward efficacy [J].
Conover, KL ;
Fulton, S ;
Shizgal, P .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2001, 56 (02) :85-101
[8]  
CONOVER KL, 2002, TELLING WORK LEISURE
[9]   FITTING INTRACRANIAL SELF-STIMULATION DATA WITH GROWTH-MODELS [J].
COULOMBE, D ;
MILIARESSIS, E .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1987, 101 (02) :209-214
[10]   A test of the formal and modern theories of matching [J].
Dallery, J ;
Soto, PL ;
McDowell, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2005, 84 (02) :129-145