Reducing uncertainty in triaging mental health presentations: Examining triage decision-making

被引:25
作者
Brown, Anne-Marie [1 ]
Clarke, Diana E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Ctr, Mental Hlth Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Fac Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
Emergency department triage; Mental health; Decision-making theory; Uncertainty; Cognitive Continuum Theory; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; ACUITY SCALE; NURSES; RELIABILITY; EXPERIENCES; STRATEGIES; ACCURACY; THINKING; SYSTEM; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.005
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Little is known about how emergency department (ED) nurses make decisions and even less is known about triage nurses' decision-making. There is compelling motivation to better understand the processes by which triage nurses make decisions, particularly with complex patient populations such as those with frequently emotive mental health and illness issues. While accuracy and reliability of triage decisions generally have been improved through the introduction of standardised triage scales and instruments, other factors such as lack of knowledge or confidence related to mental health issues, past experiences that may elicit transference and countertransference, judgments about individuals based on their behavioural presentations may impact on decisions made at triage. In this paper, we review the current research regarding the effectiveness of triage tools particularly with mental health presentations, present a theoretical framework that may guide research in understanding how triage nurses approach decision-making, and apply that framework to thinking about research in mental health-related triage. Developing a better understanding of how triage nurses make decisions, particularly in situations where issues related to mental health and illness may raise the levels of uncertainty, is crucial to ensure that they have the skills and tools they need to provide the most effective, sensitive, and compassionate care possible. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 51
页数:5
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [21] The cognitive imperative: Thinking about how we think
    Croskerry, P
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (11) : 1223 - 1231
  • [22] Dong Sandy L, 2007, CJEM, V9, P260
  • [23] Reliability of computerized emergency triage
    Dong, SL
    Bullard, MJ
    Meurer, DP
    Blitz, S
    Ohinmaa, A
    Holroyd, BR
    Rowe, BH
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (03) : 269 - 275
  • [24] Dunwoody PT, 2000, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V13, P35, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<35::AID-BDM339>3.0.CO
  • [25] 2-U
  • [26] The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid
    Eitel, DR
    Travers, DA
    Rosenau, AM
    Gilboy, N
    Wuerz, RC
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (10) : 1070 - 1080
  • [27] Evans Catherine, 2005, Emerg Nurse, V13, P16
  • [28] Swedish emergency department triage and interventions for improved patient flows: a national update
    Farrokhnia, Nasim
    Goransson, Katarina E.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 19
  • [29] Triage nurses' clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment
    Gerdtz, MF
    Bucknall, TK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (04) : 550 - 561
  • [30] Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage
    Göransson, K
    Ehrenberg, A
    Marklund, B
    Ehnfors, M
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2005, 19 (04) : 432 - 438