Computerised respiratory sounds can differentiate smokers and non-smokers

被引:7
作者
Oliveira, Ana [1 ,3 ]
Sen, Ipek [2 ]
Kahya, Yasemin P. [2 ]
Afreixo, Vera [3 ,4 ]
Marques, Alda [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro ESSUA, Sch Hlth Sci, Lab Resp 3R, Res & Rehabil Lab, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Bogazici Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Aveiro, Inst Res Biomed IBiMED, Aveiro, Portugal
[4] Univ Aveiro, Dept Math, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Computerised auscultation; Sound spectrum; Crackles; Early diagnosis; Smoking; LUNG SOUND; BREATH SOUNDS; OBSTRUCTION; SPECTRA;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-016-9887-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Cigarette smoking is often associated with the development of several respiratory diseases however, if diagnosed early, the changes in the lung tissue caused by smoking may be reversible. Computerised respiratory sounds have shown to be sensitive to detect changes within the lung tissue before any other measure, however it is unknown if it is able to detect changes in the lungs of healthy smokers. This study investigated the differences between computerised respiratory sounds of healthy smokers and non-smokers. Healthy smokers and non-smokers were recruited from a university campus. Respiratory sounds were recorded simultaneously at 6 chest locations (right and left anterior, lateral and posterior) using air-coupled electret microphones. Airflow (1.0-1.5 l/s) was recorded with a pneumotachograph. Breathing phases were detected using airflow signals and respiratory sounds with validated algorithms. Forty-four participants were enrolled: 18 smokers (mean age 26.2, SD = 7 years; mean FEV1 % predicted 104.7, SD = 9) and 26 non-smokers (mean age 25.9, SD = 3.7 years; mean FEV1 % predicted 96.8, SD = 20.2). Smokers presented significantly higher frequency at maximum sound intensity during inspiration [(M = 117, SD = 16.2 Hz vs. M = 106.4, SD = 21.6 Hz; t(43) = -2.62, p = 0.0081, d (z) = 0.55)], lower expiratory sound intensities (maximum intensity: [(M = 48.2, SD = 3.8 dB vs. M = 50.9, SD = 3.2 dB; t(43) = 2.68, p = 0.001, d (z) = -0.78)]; mean intensity: [(M = 31.2, SD = 3.6 dB vs. M = 33.7,SD = 3 dB; t(43) = 2.42, p = 0.001, d (z) = 0.75)] and higher number of inspiratory crackles (median [interquartile range] 2.2 [1.7-3.7] vs. 1.5 [1.2-2.2], p = 0.081, U = 110, r = -0.41) than non-smokers. Significant differences between computerised respiratory sounds of smokers and non-smokers have been found. Changes in respiratory sounds are often the earliest sign of disease. Thus, computerised respiratory sounds might be a promising measure to early detect smoking related respiratory diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alzahrani M., 2011, QUANTIFYING CRACKLES
[2]   LUNG SOUND ANALYSIS FOR CONTINUOUS EVALUATION OF AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION IN ASTHMA [J].
BAUGHMAN, RP ;
LOUDON, RG .
CHEST, 1985, 88 (03) :364-368
[3]   Reversible and permanent effects of tobacco smoke exposure on airway epithelial gene expression [J].
Beane, Jennifer ;
Sebastiani, Paola ;
Liu, Gang ;
Brody, Jerome S. ;
Lenburg, Marc E. ;
Spira, Avrum .
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (09)
[4]   Mechanisms of chronic airway obstruction in smokers [J].
Bohadana, A ;
Teculescu, D ;
Martinet, Y .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (02) :139-151
[5]  
Bohadana A, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P744, DOI [10.1056/NEJMra1302901, 10.1056/NEJMc1403766]
[6]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[7]  
Doherty DE., 2006, J Fam Pract, V55, pS1
[8]   Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation [J].
Fritz, Catherine O. ;
Morris, Peter E. ;
Richler, Jennifer J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2012, 141 (01) :2-18
[9]   RESPIRATORY HEALTH SCREENING USING PULMONARY-FUNCTION TESTS AND LUNG SOUND ANALYSIS [J].
GAVRIELY, N ;
NISSAN, M ;
CUGELL, DW ;
RUBIN, AHE .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (01) :35-42
[10]   SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CHEST-WALL BREATH SOUNDS IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
GAVRIELY, N ;
NISSAN, M ;
RUBIN, AHE ;
CUGELL, DW .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (12) :1292-1300