A novel model for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Romero, Quinci [1 ]
Bendahl, Par-Ola [1 ]
Ferno, Marten [1 ]
Grabau, Dorthe [3 ]
Borgquist, Signe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Oncol, Dept Clin Sci Lund, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Div Pathol, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
来源
DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Ki67; Breast cancer; Proliferation; Counting strategy; Statistical model; PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY; KI-67; ANTIGEN; MIB-1; RECOMMENDATIONS; METAANALYSIS; BIOMARKERS; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/1746-1596-9-118
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Ki67 is currently the proliferation biomarker of choice, with both prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer. A lack of consensus regarding Ki67 use in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical practice may hinder its formal acceptance in the clinical setting. Methods: One hundred breast cancer samples were stained for Ki67. A standard estimation of Ki67 using fixed denominators of 200, 400 and 1 000 counted tumor cells was performed, and a cut-off at 20% was applied, Ki67static. A novel stepwise counting strategy for Ki67 estimation, Ki67(scs), was developed based on rejection regions derived from exact two-sided binomial confidence intervals for proportions. Ki67scs was defined by the following parameters: the cut-off (20%), minimum (50) and maximum (400) number of tumor cells to count, increment (10) and overall significance level of the test procedure (0.05). Results from Ki67scs were compared to results from the Ki67static estimation with fixed denominators. Results: For Ki67scs, the median number of tumor cells needed to determine Ki67 status was 100; the average, 175. Among 38 highly proliferative samples, the average Ki67scs fraction was 45%. For these samples, the fraction decreased from 39% to 37% to 35% with static counting of 200, 400 and 1 000 cells, respectively. The largest absolute difference between the estimation methods was 23% (42% (Ki67scs) vs. 19% (Ki67static)) and resulted in an altered sample classification. Among the 82 unequivocal samples, 74 samples received the same classification using both Ki67scs and Ki67static. Of the eight disparate samples, seven were classified highly proliferative by Ki67static when 200 cells were counted; whereas all eight cases were classified as low proliferative when 1 000 cells were counted. Conclusions: Ki67 estimation using fixed denominators may be inadequate, particularly for tumors demonstrating extensive heterogeneity. We propose a time saving stepwise counting strategy, which acknowledges small highly proliferative hot spots. Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3588156111195336
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer
    Jing, Nicola
    Fang, Catherine
    Williams, David S.
    PATHOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 371 - 378
  • [42] Ki67 proliferation in core biopsies versus surgical samples - a model for neo-adjuvant breast cancer studies
    Romero, Quinci
    Bendahl, Par-Ola
    Klintman, Marie
    Loman, Niklas
    Ingvar, Christian
    Ryden, Lisa
    Rose, Carsten
    Grabau, Dorthe
    Borgquist, Signe
    BMC CANCER, 2011, 11
  • [43] Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Other Prognostic Markers and Potential in Pakistani Patients
    Haroon, Saroona
    Hashmi, Atif Ali
    Khurshid, Amna
    Kanpurwala, Muhammad Adnan
    Mujtuba, Shafaq
    Malik, Babar
    Faridi, Naveen
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (07) : 4353 - 4358
  • [44] Ki67 and Salivary Cancer
    Ben-Izhak, Ofer
    Akrish, Sharon
    Nagler, Rafael M.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2008, 26 (10) : 1015 - 1023
  • [45] Ki67 proliferation in core biopsies versus surgical samples - a model for neo-adjuvant breast cancer studies
    Quinci Romero
    Pär-Ola Bendahl
    Marie Klintman
    Niklas Loman
    Christian Ingvar
    Lisa Rydén
    Carsten Rose
    Dorthe Grabau
    Signe Borgquist
    BMC Cancer, 11
  • [46] Phosphohistone H3 outperforms Ki67 as a marker of outcome for breast cancer patients
    Gerring, Zac
    Pearson, John F.
    Morrin, Helen R.
    Robinson, Bridget A.
    Harris, Gavin C.
    Walker, Logan C.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 538 - 547
  • [47] Higher Ki67 Expression is Associates With Unfavorable Prognostic Factors and Shorter Survival in Breast Cancer
    Kilickap, Saadettin
    Kaya, Yalcin
    Yucel, Birsen
    Tuncer, Ersin
    Babacan, Nalan Akgul
    Elagoz, Sahande
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (03) : 1381 - 1385
  • [48] Ki67 targeted strategies for cancer therapy
    C. Yang
    J. Zhang
    M. Ding
    K. Xu
    L. Li
    L. Mao
    J. Zheng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2018, 20 : 570 - 575
  • [49] The prognostic value of Ki67 in systemically untreated patients with node-negative breast cancer
    Pathmanathan, Nirmala
    Balleine, Rosemary L.
    Jayasinghe, Upali W.
    Bilinski, Kellie L.
    Provan, Pamela J.
    Byth, Karen
    Bilous, A. Michael
    Salisbury, Elizabeth L.
    Boyages, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [50] Ki67 measured in metastatic tissue and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer
    Claudette Falato
    Julie Lorent
    Edneia Tani
    Eva Karlsson
    Paul K. Wright
    Jonas Bergh
    Theodoros Foukakis
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 147 : 407 - 414