A novel model for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Romero, Quinci [1 ]
Bendahl, Par-Ola [1 ]
Ferno, Marten [1 ]
Grabau, Dorthe [3 ]
Borgquist, Signe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Oncol, Dept Clin Sci Lund, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Div Pathol, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
来源
DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Ki67; Breast cancer; Proliferation; Counting strategy; Statistical model; PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY; KI-67; ANTIGEN; MIB-1; RECOMMENDATIONS; METAANALYSIS; BIOMARKERS; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/1746-1596-9-118
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Ki67 is currently the proliferation biomarker of choice, with both prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer. A lack of consensus regarding Ki67 use in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical practice may hinder its formal acceptance in the clinical setting. Methods: One hundred breast cancer samples were stained for Ki67. A standard estimation of Ki67 using fixed denominators of 200, 400 and 1 000 counted tumor cells was performed, and a cut-off at 20% was applied, Ki67static. A novel stepwise counting strategy for Ki67 estimation, Ki67(scs), was developed based on rejection regions derived from exact two-sided binomial confidence intervals for proportions. Ki67scs was defined by the following parameters: the cut-off (20%), minimum (50) and maximum (400) number of tumor cells to count, increment (10) and overall significance level of the test procedure (0.05). Results from Ki67scs were compared to results from the Ki67static estimation with fixed denominators. Results: For Ki67scs, the median number of tumor cells needed to determine Ki67 status was 100; the average, 175. Among 38 highly proliferative samples, the average Ki67scs fraction was 45%. For these samples, the fraction decreased from 39% to 37% to 35% with static counting of 200, 400 and 1 000 cells, respectively. The largest absolute difference between the estimation methods was 23% (42% (Ki67scs) vs. 19% (Ki67static)) and resulted in an altered sample classification. Among the 82 unequivocal samples, 74 samples received the same classification using both Ki67scs and Ki67static. Of the eight disparate samples, seven were classified highly proliferative by Ki67static when 200 cells were counted; whereas all eight cases were classified as low proliferative when 1 000 cells were counted. Conclusions: Ki67 estimation using fixed denominators may be inadequate, particularly for tumors demonstrating extensive heterogeneity. We propose a time saving stepwise counting strategy, which acknowledges small highly proliferative hot spots. Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3588156111195336
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ki67 and Salivary Cancer
    Ben-Izhak, Ofer
    Akrish, Sharon
    Nagler, Rafael M.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2008, 26 (10) : 1015 - 1023
  • [32] The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer
    Rewcastle, Emma
    Skaland, Ivar
    Gudlaugsson, Einar
    Fykse, Silja Kavlie
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 207 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [33] Prognosis related to Ki67 in early breast cancer.
    Gerson, R.
    Alban, F.
    Villalobos, A.
    Serrano, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [34] Ki67 expression in triple negative and luminal A breast cancer
    Sullu, Y.
    Demirag, G. G.
    Ozen, N.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S81 - S82
  • [35] Questions about Ki67 staining in luminal breast cancer
    Kadri Altundag
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 167 : 599 - 599
  • [36] Questions about Ki67 staining in luminal breast cancer
    Altundag, Kadri
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 167 (02) : 599 - 599
  • [37] Value of Ki67 in breast cancer: the debate is still open
    Colozza, Mariantonietta
    Sidoni, Angelo
    Piccart-Gebhart, Martine
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (05): : 414 - 415
  • [38] Strategies for developing Ki67 as a useful biomarker in breast cancer
    Denkert, Carsten
    Budczies, Jan
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Wienert, Stephan
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Klauschen, Frederick
    BREAST, 2015, 24 : S67 - S72
  • [39] Evaluation of Ki67 as a useful routine marker in breast cancer
    Bhagwat, P.
    Ally, M.
    Moorehead, J.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2014, 465 : S108 - S108
  • [40] A comparative study between Ki67 positive versus Ki67 negative females with breast cancer: Cross sectional study
    Bahaddin, Mowafak Masoud
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 60 : 232 - 235