A novel model for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer

被引:29
|
作者
Romero, Quinci [1 ]
Bendahl, Par-Ola [1 ]
Ferno, Marten [1 ]
Grabau, Dorthe [3 ]
Borgquist, Signe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Oncol, Dept Clin Sci Lund, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Div Pathol, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
来源
DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Ki67; Breast cancer; Proliferation; Counting strategy; Statistical model; PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY; KI-67; ANTIGEN; MIB-1; RECOMMENDATIONS; METAANALYSIS; BIOMARKERS; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1186/1746-1596-9-118
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Ki67 is currently the proliferation biomarker of choice, with both prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer. A lack of consensus regarding Ki67 use in pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical practice may hinder its formal acceptance in the clinical setting. Methods: One hundred breast cancer samples were stained for Ki67. A standard estimation of Ki67 using fixed denominators of 200, 400 and 1 000 counted tumor cells was performed, and a cut-off at 20% was applied, Ki67static. A novel stepwise counting strategy for Ki67 estimation, Ki67(scs), was developed based on rejection regions derived from exact two-sided binomial confidence intervals for proportions. Ki67scs was defined by the following parameters: the cut-off (20%), minimum (50) and maximum (400) number of tumor cells to count, increment (10) and overall significance level of the test procedure (0.05). Results from Ki67scs were compared to results from the Ki67static estimation with fixed denominators. Results: For Ki67scs, the median number of tumor cells needed to determine Ki67 status was 100; the average, 175. Among 38 highly proliferative samples, the average Ki67scs fraction was 45%. For these samples, the fraction decreased from 39% to 37% to 35% with static counting of 200, 400 and 1 000 cells, respectively. The largest absolute difference between the estimation methods was 23% (42% (Ki67scs) vs. 19% (Ki67static)) and resulted in an altered sample classification. Among the 82 unequivocal samples, 74 samples received the same classification using both Ki67scs and Ki67static. Of the eight disparate samples, seven were classified highly proliferative by Ki67static when 200 cells were counted; whereas all eight cases were classified as low proliferative when 1 000 cells were counted. Conclusions: Ki67 estimation using fixed denominators may be inadequate, particularly for tumors demonstrating extensive heterogeneity. We propose a time saving stepwise counting strategy, which acknowledges small highly proliferative hot spots. Virtual Slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/3588156111195336
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ki67 in Breast Cancer:The Effect of Different Length of Fixation on Ki 67 Index
    Faragalla, H. F.
    Feeley, L.
    Bane, A.
    Mulligan, A. M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 40A - 40A
  • [22] Interobserver concordance of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group Ki67 Ring Study
    Mikami, Yoshiki
    Ueno, Takayuki
    Yoshimura, Kenichi
    Tsuda, Hitoshi
    Kurosumi, Masafumi
    Masuda, Shinobu
    Horii, Rie
    Toi, Masakazu
    Sasano, Hironobu
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2013, 104 (11) : 1539 - 1543
  • [23] Implementation of Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer
    Vanderschelden, Rachel K.
    Jerome, Jacob A.
    Gonzalez, Daniel
    Seigh, Lindsey
    Carter, Gloria J.
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Elishaev, Esther
    Louis Fine, Jeffrey
    Harinath, Lakshmi
    Jones, Mirka W.
    Villatoro, Tatiana M.
    Soong, Thing Rinda
    Yu, Jing
    Zhao, Chengquan
    Hartman, Doug
    Bhargava, Rohit
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2024, 32 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [24] Ki67 in Breast Cancer: The Effect of Different Length of Fixation on Ki 67 Index
    Faragalla, H. F.
    Feeley, L.
    Bane, A.
    Mulligan, A. M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 40A - 40A
  • [25] Correlation between Ki67 and Breast Cancer Prognosis
    Kontzoglou, Konstantinos
    Palla, Victoria
    Karaolanis, George
    Karaiskos, Ioannis
    Alexiou, Ioannis
    Pateras, Ioannis
    Konstantoudakis, Konstantinos
    Stamatakos, Michael
    ONCOLOGY, 2013, 84 (04) : 219 - 225
  • [26] Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential
    Yerushalmi, Rinat
    Woods, Ryan
    Ravdin, Peter M.
    Hayes, Malcolm M.
    Gelmon, Karen A.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (02): : 174 - 183
  • [27] Ki67 in breast cancer: a useful prognostic marker?
    Caldarella, A.
    Crocetti, E.
    Paci, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 542 - 542
  • [28] Improvement of Ki67 Staining in Breast Cancer (BC)
    Muftah, A. A.
    Aleskandarany, M.
    Al-Kaabi, M. M.
    Jerjees, D. A.
    Abduljabbar, R. F.
    Alsubhi, N. H.
    Ellis, I. O.
    Rakha, E. A.
    Green, A. R.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2015, 237 : S30 - S30
  • [29] KI67 Expression in Primary Male Breast Cancer
    Erices-Leclercq, Melanie
    Rudlowski, Christian
    Baldus, Stephan
    Foerster, Frank
    Schroeder, Lars
    Stiller, Franziska
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 27 - 28
  • [30] Interlaboratory variability of Ki67 staining in breast cancer
    Focke, Cornelia M.
    Buerger, Horst
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Finsterbusch, Kai
    Glaeser, Doreen
    Korsching, Eberhard
    Decker, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 84 : 219 - 227