Acting for a reason

被引：0
作者：
Korsgaard, Christine M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源：
ANUARIO FILOSOFICO | 2017年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词：
Practical reason; normativity; motivation; good-making properties; action and purpose;
D O I：
10.15581/009.50.1.87-118
中图分类号：
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要：
What do we mean when we say we act "for a reason"? What is the connection between Reason, as a faculty, and the reasons of our actions? This article maintains that Aristotle and Kant had a similar answer to this question. Moreover: the answer they give can help us to clarify the controversy between moral realism and empiricism regarding the ontological and epistemological status of what we call the reason of an action.
引用
收藏
页码：87 / 118
页数：32
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, CREATING KINGDOM END, P164
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, SELF CONSTITUTION AG
  • [3] Cullity G., 1997, ETHICS PRACTICAL REA, P243
  • [4] Engstrom S., 1996, ARISTOTLE KANT STOIC, P205
  • [5] Korsgaard C. M., 1996, SOURCES NORMATIVITY, P107
  • [6] Motivation, metaphysics, and the value of the self: A reply to Ginsborg, Guyer, and Schneewind
    Korsgaard, CN
    [J]. ETHICS, 1998, 109 (01) : 49 - 66
  • [7] MILL J. STUART, 1979, UTILITARIANISM, P2
  • [8] NOZIK R., 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS, VI, P71
  • [9] RAZ J., 1999, ENGAGING REASON THEO, P63
  • [10] ST AUGUSTINE, 1961, CONFESSIONS, VII, P47
12