Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis of the Learning Curve in a Training Model In Vivo

被引:5
作者
Cavallari, G. [1 ]
Tsivian, M. [1 ]
Neri, F. [1 ]
Bertelli, R. [1 ]
Faenza, A. [1 ]
Nardo, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Surg & Transplantat, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Bologna, Italy
关键词
COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.02.066
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) outcomes are impaired mainly by the risks associated with the learning curve. Considering that practice by in vivo training may reduced this risk, we recently assessed a swine model of HALDN. The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve of HALDN using an in vivo training model. Materials and Methods. Ten female white pigs underwent a left and then a right HALDN in the same session for a total of 20 procedures by the same first operator. The HALDN were divided into 2 groups: group A, the first 10 nephrectomies and group 13, the latter 10. For each group, we assessed operative times, intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), and graft quality. Results. We observed a significant decrease in operative times among group B. Two right HALDN of group A were converted to open procedures owing to bleeding. The EBL was consequently lower in group B (P < .05); the mean WIT was not significantly different between the 2 study groups. The graft quality was good in 5/8 kidneys evaluated in group A and 9/10 in group B. Discussion. Standardization of analyzed parameters after a number of procedures, which were comparable to the clinical settings, confirmed the validity of this in vivo training model and its potential utility to allow many transplantation centers to adopt this technique by reducing the risk of the learning curve.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1127
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A new swine training model of hand-assisted donor nephrectomy [J].
Cavallari, G. ;
Tsivian, M. ;
Bertelli, R. ;
Neri, F. ;
Faenza, A. ;
Nardo, B. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (06) :2035-2037
[2]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy [J].
Handschin, AE ;
Weber, M ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (11) :1323-1332
[3]  
Hollenbeck BK, 2004, J UROLOGY, V171, P35, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000099680.27793.c5
[4]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Overcoming the learning curve [J].
Khauli, RB ;
Hussein, M ;
Hijaz, A ;
Wazzan, W .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (05) :2673-2674
[5]   Comparison of laparoscopic versus hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy [J].
Kokkinos, Constantinos ;
Nanidis, Theodore ;
Antcliffe, David ;
Darzi, Ara W. ;
Tekkis, Paris ;
Papalois, Vassilios .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (01) :41-47
[6]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectoriy - Is it safe? Analysis of 80 consecutive cases and comparison with open nephrectomy [J].
Leventhal, JR ;
Deeik, RK ;
Joehl, RJ ;
Rege, RV ;
Herman, CH ;
Fryer, JP ;
Kaufman, D ;
Abecassis, M ;
Stuart, FP .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (04) :602-606
[7]  
Mateo RB, 2003, AM SURGEON, V69, P771
[8]   A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy [J].
Nogueira, JM ;
Cangro, CB ;
Fink, JC ;
Schweitzer, E ;
Wiland, A ;
Klassen, DK ;
Gardner, J ;
Flowers, J ;
Jacobs, S ;
Cho, E ;
Philosophe, B ;
Bartlett, ST ;
Weir, MR .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (05) :722-728
[9]   Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy - Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique [J].
Philosophe, B ;
Kuo, PC ;
Schweitzer, EJ ;
Farney, AC ;
Lim, JW ;
Johnson, LB ;
Jacobs, S ;
Flowers, JL ;
Cho, ES ;
Bartlett, ST .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (04) :497-502
[10]  
RATNER LE, 1995, TRANSPLANTATION, V60, P1047