Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Call for Development and Validation of Patient-Oriented Shared Decision-Making Tools

被引:12
作者
Schrager, Sarina [1 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI 53715 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision-making; mammography; primary healthcare; risk assessment; communication; RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; DENSITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1089/jwh.2017.6775
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The latest recommendations on breast cancer screening in women from 40 to 49 years charge primary care providers (PCPs) with completing shared decision-making with women about screening mammography. However, there is a lack of supportive materials accompanying this directive. No easy-to-use risk assessment tool is available for PCPs to stratify women's risk. Neither is an evidence-based patient-centered way to assess values surrounding mammography available. To provide the highest quality care for women of 40-49 years, further research should clarify ways to apply risk assessment and values clarification to individual women.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 116
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V118, P372, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c98e5
  • [2] [Anonymous], BREAST CANC SURV CON
  • [3] Breast Screening Decisions, 2018, BREAST SCR DEC
  • [4] Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Stavrinos, Paula
    Sampson, Sarah
    Fox, Lynne
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Harvie, Michelle N.
    Wilson, Mary
    Beetles, Ursula
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Lim, Yit
    Jain, Anil
    Bundred, Sara
    Barr, Nicola
    Reece, Valerie
    Howell, Anthony
    Cuzick, Jack
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [5] Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: Clinicians' current practice and future needs
    Collins, Ian M.
    Steel, Emma
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Emery, Jon D.
    Bickerstaffe, Adrian
    Trainer, Alison
    Butow, Phyllis
    Pirotta, Marie
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Hopper, John
    Phillips, Kelly-Anne
    Keogh, Louise A.
    [J]. BREAST, 2014, 23 (05) : 644 - 650
  • [6] Physician Adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guidelines
    Corbelli, Jennifer
    Borrero, Sonya
    Bonnema, Rachel
    McNamara, Megan
    Kraemer, Kevin
    Rubio, Doris
    Karpov, Irina
    McNeil, Melissa
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2014, 24 (03) : E313 - E319
  • [7] Breast cancer risk-assessment models
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    Howell, Anthony
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (05)
  • [8] PROJECTING INDIVIDUALIZED PROBABILITIES OF DEVELOPING BREAST-CANCER FOR WHITE FEMALES WHO ARE BEING EXAMINED ANNUALLY
    GAIL, MH
    BRINTON, LA
    BYAR, DP
    CORLE, DK
    GREEN, SB
    SCHAIRER, C
    MULVIHILL, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (24) : 1879 - 1886
  • [9] Perceived Susceptibility to Breast Cancer Moderates the Effect of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages on Use of Screening Mammography
    Gallagher, Kristel M.
    Updegraff, John A.
    Rothman, Alexander J.
    Sims, Linda
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 30 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [10] Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Klabunde, Carrie N.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Chen, Jane S.
    Bitton, Asaf
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Onega, Tracy
    Kim, Jane J.
    MacLean, Charles D.
    Harris, Kimberly
    Yamartino, Phillip
    Howe, Kathleen
    Pearson, Loretta
    Feldman, Sarah
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (01) : 52 - 59