Aggressive and prosocial behaviors: The social success of bistrategic preadolescents

被引:20
作者
Wurster, Tabitha [1 ]
Xie, Hongling [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
physical and social forms of aggression; prosocial behavior; bistrategic subtype; peer groups; popularity; early adolescence; PEER GROUPS; PERCEIVED POPULARITY; RESOURCE CONTROL; NETWORKS; ADOLESCENTS; DOMINANCE; GENDER; CONFIGURATIONS; DIMENSIONS; LIKABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0165025414531463
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study examined the social functioning of bistrategic youths (i.e., those who employ both aggressive and prosocial behavior) in order to further understand their social competence in peer social networks. Within our sample of 318 fifth-grade participants recruited from an urban school district in the northeastern US, bistrategic preadolescents were identified, along with aggressives, prosocials, typicals, and noncontrollers. Bistrategic youths were found to hold the highest individual status and group status among all five subtypes within the network. Bistrategic youths and other active controller youths (i.e., prosocials and aggressives) were more likely to associate with peers of the same subtype in social groups. In addition, bistrategics who associated with same subtype (i.e., homogenous) peers held elevated group status, whereas bistrategicswho associated with non-homogenous peers held heightened individual status. Further, results illustrate how bistrategics selectively target highly popular peers as victims of social aggression. Findings extend previous research by demonstrating the social success of bistrategic youths based on their high individual and group status, and by illuminating their strategic employment of different forms of aggression towards peers of different popularity status.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 377
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Adler P.A., 1998, Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity
[2]   Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework [J].
Aureli, F ;
Cords, M ;
Van Schaik, CP .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2002, 64 :325-343
[3]  
BJORKQVIST K, 1994, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V20, P27, DOI 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::AID-AB2480200105>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-Q
[5]  
Cairns R, 1998, New Dir Child Dev, P25
[6]  
Cairns R.B., 1985, J. Early Adolesc., V5, P339, DOI DOI 10.1177/0272431685053007
[7]  
Cairns R. B., 1994, LIFELINES RISKS PATH
[8]   FRIENDSHIPS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS IN CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE - FLUIDITY, RELIABILITY, AND INTERRELATIONS [J].
CAIRNS, RB ;
LEUNG, MC ;
BUCHANAN, L ;
CAIRNS, BD .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 66 (05) :1330-1345
[9]   SOCIAL NETWORKS AND AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR - PEER SUPPORT OR PEER REJECTION [J].
CAIRNS, RB ;
CAIRNS, BD ;
NECKERMAN, HJ ;
GEST, SD ;
GARIEPY, JL .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 24 (06) :815-823
[10]  
Cillessen AHN, 2004, DECADE BEHAV, P3