Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey

被引:26
作者
Palmer, Suetonia C. [1 ]
de Berardis, Giorgia [2 ]
Craig, Jonathan C. [3 ]
Tong, Allison [3 ]
Tonelli, Marcello [4 ]
Pellegrini, Fabio [2 ,5 ]
Ruospo, Marinella [6 ]
Hegbrant, Jorgen [6 ]
Wollheim, Charlotta [6 ]
Celia, Eduardo [6 ]
Gelfman, Ruben [6 ]
Ferrari, Juan Nin [6 ]
Torok, Marietta [6 ]
Murgo, Marco [6 ]
Leal, Miguel [6 ]
Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna [6 ]
Dulawa, Jan [6 ]
Strippoli, Giovanni F. M. [2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Nephrol & Immunol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] IRCCS Casa Sollievo Sofferenza, I-71013 San Giovanni Rotondo Fog, Italy
[6] Diaverum Sci Med Off, Lund, Sweden
[7] Univ Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Bari, Italy
[8] Amedeo Avogadro Univ Eastern Piedmont, Div Nephrol & Transplantat, Dept Translat Med, Novara, Italy
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2014年 / 4卷 / 05期
关键词
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; DIALYSIS CARE; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH-CARE; OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; QUALITY; COMMUNICATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. Design: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. Setting: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. Participants: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. Primary and secondary outcomes: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. Results: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists' instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). Conclusions: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients' expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, USRDS 2012 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States
  • [2] What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study
    Audrey, Suzanne
    Abel, Julian
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Falk, Stephen
    Campbell, Rona
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7668): : 492 - 496
  • [3] Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
    Barry, Michael J.
    Edgman-Levitan, Susan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) : 780 - 781
  • [4] Multidisciplinary Team Care May Slow the Rate of Decline in Renal Function
    Bayliss, Elizabeth A.
    Bhardwaja, Bharati
    Ross, Colleen
    Beck, Arne
    Lanese, Diane M.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 6 (04): : 704 - 710
  • [5] The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin
    Besarab, A
    Bolton, WK
    Browne, JK
    Egrie, JC
    Nissenson, AR
    Okamoto, DM
    Schwab, SJ
    Goodkin, DA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (09) : 584 - 590
  • [6] Bidaut-Russell M, ARTHRITIS RHEUM
  • [7] Bowling A, 2002, J Epidemiol Community Health, V56, P482, DOI 10.1136/jech.56.7.482-a
  • [8] Chronic Illness and Patient Satisfaction
    Carlin, Caroline S.
    Christianson, Jon B.
    Keenan, Patricia
    Finch, Michael
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 47 (06) : 2250 - 2272
  • [9] Effect of Cinacalcet on Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Undergoing Dialysis
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    Block, Geoffrey A.
    Correa-Rotter, Ricardo
    Drueeke, Tilman B.
    Floege, Juergen
    Goodman, William G.
    Herzog, Charles A.
    Kubo, Yumi
    London, Gerard M.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    Mix, T. Christian H.
    Moe, Sharon M.
    Trotman, Marie-Louise
    Wheeler, David C.
    Parfrey, Patrick S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (26) : 2482 - 2494
  • [10] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis
    Cooper, Bruce A.
    Branley, Pauline
    Bulfone, Liliana
    Collins, John F.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Fraenkel, Margaret B.
    Harris, Anthony
    Johnson, David W.
    Kesselhut, Joan
    Li, Jing Jing
    Luxton, Grant
    Pilmore, Andrew
    Tiller, David J.
    Harris, David C.
    Pollock, Carol A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (07) : 609 - 619