Breast Cancer Risk Assessment IN PRIMARY CARE

被引:2
作者
Brown, Shannon Lynn [1 ]
Kartoz, Connie [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Ewing, NJ USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Primary care; Risk assessment; SOCIETY GUIDELINES; SCREENING-PROGRAM; ASSESSMENT MODELS; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; ISSUES; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/NMC.0000000000000068
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common cancer (when excluding skin cancers) in women and the second most common cause of cancer death in women, with a lifetime prevalence of 12.5% (American Cancer Society [ACS], 2013a, 2013b; National Cancer Institute [NCI], 2012). Breast cancer screening reduces risk of cancer death, thereby increasing rate of survival to up to 89% for women with stage 1 and 2 breast cancer (Bleyer & Welch, 2012; Howlader et al., 2012). Despite these data, undue harm may occur with unnecessary screening because overidentification of risk, and excessive, costly biopsies may result. Costs and benefits of screening must be weighed. Nurses at all levels can play a pivotal role in promotion of appropriate breast cancer screening and subsequently breast cancer prevention by using accurate screening tools, such as the Tyrer-Cuzick model. Although there are some limitations with this tool, screening at the primary care level has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes (Roetzheim et al., 2012). Its use can help nurses accurately assess a woman's breast cancer risk, by promoting appropriate screening at the primary care level (Roetzheim et al., 2012).
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Aetna, 2013, CLIN POL B MAGN RES
  • [2] Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme
    Amir, E
    Evans, DG
    Shenton, A
    Lalloo, F
    Moran, A
    Boggis, C
    Wilson, M
    Howell, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 40 (11): : 807 - 814
  • [3] Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models
    Amir, Eitan
    Freedman, Orit C.
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Evans, D. Gareth
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10): : 680 - 691
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, CANC FACTS FIG 2013
  • [5] [Anonymous], BREAST CANC EARL DET
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, SEER stat fact sheets: Corpus and Uterus
  • [7] Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density
    Assi, Valentina
    Warwick, Jane
    Cuzick, Jack
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 9 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [8] Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility:: Recommendation statement
    Berg, AO
    Allan, JD
    Calonge, N
    Frame, PS
    Gordis, L
    Gregory, KD
    Harris, R
    Johnson, MS
    Klein, JD
    Loveland-Cherry, C
    Moyer, VA
    Ockene, JK
    Petitti, DB
    Siu, AL
    Teutsch, SM
    Yawn, BP
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (05) : 355 - 361
  • [9] Tailored Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer: What Now and What Next?
    Berg, Wendie A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (02) : 390 - 399
  • [10] Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence
    Bleyer, Archie
    Welch, H. Gilbert
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (21) : 1998 - 2005