Improved coupling of finite element method with material point method based on a particle-to-surface contact algorithm

被引:49
|
作者
Chen, Z. P. [1 ]
Qiu, X. M. [1 ]
Zhang, X. [1 ]
Lian, Y. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Material point method; Coupled finite element material point method; Adaptive finite element material point method; Impact; Penetration; HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT; ALUMINUM FOAM; SIMULATION; MODEL; MPM; FRAGMENTATION; SPH; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2015.04.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
For extreme deformation problems, material point method (MPM) takes competitive advantages compared with finite element method (FEM) which often encounters mesh distortion. However, for small deformation problems, FEM is still more efficient and accurate than MPM in most cases. Hence, a coupled finite element material point (CFEMP) method and an adaptive finite element material point method (AFEMP) have been proposed by our group to take advantages of both methods. Because the coupling between MPM particles and FEM elements was implemented based on the MPM grid-based contact method, both CFEMP and AFEMP demand a high degree of consistence of meshing between FEM domain and MPM domain. This may lead to over meshing in FEM domain, thus significantly decreases the time step size and increases computational cost as well as data storage. In order to allow arbitrary inconsistent meshing, the CFEMP and AFEMP methods are further improved in this article. The coupling between the MPM particles and FEM elements is implemented based on a particle-to-surface contact algorithm rather than the MPM grid-based contact method, so that the consistent meshing is no more needed. Thus, the meshing of FEM body can be much coarser than the MPM grid. Numerical studies illustrate that the robustness, efficiency and accuracy of the improved CFEMP (ICFEMP) method and the improved AFEMP (IAFEMP) method are much higher than MPM, CFEMP and AFEMP. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coupling of finite element method with material point method by local multi-mesh contact method
    Lian, Y. P.
    Zhang, X.
    Liu, Y.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 200 (47-48) : 3482 - 3494
  • [2] Contact algorithm of the material point method and comparison with the finite element method
    Huang, Peng
    Liu, Dong-huan
    Guo, Hu
    Xie, Ke
    Zhang, Qing-ping
    Deng, Zhi-fang
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 28 (06) : 1015 - 1030
  • [3] Particle-to-surface frictional contact algorithm for material point method using weighted least squares
    Nakamura, Keita
    Matsumura, Satoshi
    Mizutani, Takaaki
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 134
  • [4] The pinball contact algorithm for the material point method
    Su, Hao
    Guan, Tianyuan
    Wang, Shuai
    Chen, Cong
    Liu, Yan
    COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS, 2025,
  • [5] Improved Incompressible Material Point Method Based on Particle Density Correction
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Xiong
    Sze, Kam Yim
    Liang, Yong
    Liu, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2018, 15 (07)
  • [6] An adaptive finite element material point method and its application in extreme deformation problems
    Lian, Y. P.
    Zhang, X.
    Liu, Y.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 241 : 275 - 285
  • [7] Monolithic coupling of the implicit material point method with the finite element method
    Aulisa, Eugenio
    Capodaglio, Giacomo
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2019, 219 : 1 - 15
  • [8] Coupling between finite element method and material point method for problems with extreme deformation
    Lian, Yanping
    Zhang, Xiong
    Liu, Yan
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS LETTERS, 2012, 2 (02)
  • [10] Coupling of material point method and discrete element method for granular flows impacting simulations
    Liu, Chuanqi
    Sun, Qicheng
    Zhou, Gordon G. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 (02) : 172 - 188