Impact of affluence, nuclear and alternative energy on US carbon emissions from 1960 to 2014

被引:33
作者
Pan, Binbin [1 ]
Zhang, Yulong [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Marxism, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
CO2; emissions; STIRPAT model; Ridge regression; US; CO2; EMISSIONS; RIDGE REGRESSION; STIRPAT MODEL; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CONSUMPTION; POPULATION; COUNTRIES; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2020.100581
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Using the extended STIRPAT model, this research examines the influence of various factors on US carbon emission from 1960 to 2019, including nuclear and alternative energy of total, fossil energy of total, GDP per capita, total population, urban population of total and merchandise trade of GDP. Ridge regression was used to perform the study. The research results show the significant of all factors on carbon emission. The estimated elastic coefficients reveal the most important factor influencing carbon emission is merchandise trade of GDP. GDP per capita has negative impact on carbon emission. Nuclear and alternative energy of total, urban population of total are also prominent influencing factors, while the other factors such as total population and fossil energy of total have less significant impact on carbon emission in US. These findings of this research will be of great significance for US to control its carbon emission in the future and to mitigate the global warming to some extent.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama ;
Ozturk, Ilhan ;
Lean, Hooi Hooi .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (01) :621-644
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ECOL EC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WORKING PAPERS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ENERGY BUILD, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100999-4.00004-6
[5]   Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: An ethical dilemma [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 68 :808-824
[6]   Are there Environmental Kuznets Curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Christou, Christina ;
Gupta, Rangan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 69 :551-558
[7]   Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries [J].
Ben Jebli, Mehdi ;
Ben Youssef, Slim ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 :824-831
[8]   Comparative analysis on the socioeconomic drivers of industrial air pollutant emissions between Japan and China: Insights for the further-abatement period based on the LMDI method [J].
Chang, Miao ;
Zheng, Ji ;
Inoue, Yukiko ;
Tian, Xin ;
Chen, Qing ;
Gan, Tiantian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 :240-250
[9]   Geomechanical model test on dam stability and application to Jinping High arch dam [J].
Chen, Yuan ;
Zhang, Lin ;
Yang, Baoquan ;
Dong, Jianhua ;
Chen, Jianye .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2015, 76 :1-9
[10]  
Chertow M.R., 2000, J. Ind. Ecol., V4, P13, DOI DOI 10.1162/10881980052541927