Evolvement of Rank-Size Distribution of Regional Container Ports: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta of China

被引:8
作者
Chen, Jihong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Anti [1 ]
Di, Zhongjie [1 ]
Wan, Zheng [1 ,3 ]
Tian, Yan [2 ]
Li, Kevin X. [4 ]
Huang, Tiancun [1 ]
Zhao, Majun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Business, Zhuhai 519088, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Inst Transportat Studies, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Zhejiang Univ, OCean Coll, Zhoushan 316021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Regional ports; container port; rank-size distribution; Yangtze River Delta; port groups; Zipf's three-parameter model; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ZIPFS LAW; EVOLUTION; POLICY; MODEL; CONNECTIVITY; PERSPECTIVE; COMPETITION; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913879
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Regional container port operation plays a crucial role in international trade and economic development. Amid fierce competition, orderly running of regional ports is vital. The rank-size status of the regional container ports indicates the orderliness and distribution concentration of port system development and is the focus of port administrations and port operators. This paper introduces the rank-size distribution rule into studies on the development of regional container port systems and proves that Zipf's three-parameter model can effectively describe the evolvement of the rank-size system of regional container ports, taking the container port group in the Yangtze River Delta as an example. This paper finds that the regional container ports tend to become concentrated in high ranks during evolvement. Moreover, the macroeconomic environment has a great impact on the distribution concentration of regional container ports. Economic procyclicality can accelerate port concentration. On the other hand, economic counter-cyclicality will induce port decentralization. The results of this paper are conducive to port administrations and enterprises to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the development of regional container ports and to formulate the proper development plans. The results are also helpful for government departments to well design the development strategies for port and shipping development and better steer the benign development of regional container port groups.
引用
收藏
页码:61273 / 61282
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Hackmann A., 2018, TECH REP
[22]   A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks [J].
Halim, Ronald A. ;
Kwakkel, Jan H. ;
Tavasszy, Lorant A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2016, 95 :368-384
[23]   Regional Transformation and Port Cluster Competition: The Case of the Pearl River Delta in South China [J].
Homosombat, Winai ;
Ng, Adolf K. Y. ;
Fu, Xiaowen .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2016, 47 (03) :349-362
[24]   Measuring port efficiency using bootstrapped DEA: the case of Vietnamese ports [J].
Hong-Oanh Nguyen ;
Hong-Van Nguyen ;
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Chin, Anthony T. H. ;
Tongzon, Jose .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 43 (05) :644-659
[25]   Norwegian port connectivity and its policy implications [J].
Jia, Haiying ;
Lampe, Ove Daae ;
Solteszova, Veronika ;
Strandenes, Siri P. .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 44 (08) :956-966
[26]   How competition is driving change in port governance, strategic decision-making and government policy in the United States [J].
Knatz, Geraldine .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 22 :67-77
[27]   On double cycling for container port productivity improvement [J].
Ku, Dusan ;
Arthanari, Tiru S. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 243 (1-2) :55-70
[28]  
Lam J.S.L., 2016, Dynamic Shipping and Port Development in the Globalized Economy, P12, DOI DOI 10.1057/9781137514295_2
[29]  
Lee PT-W., 2016, DYNAMIC SHIPPING POR
[30]   Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of port-centric supply chain disruption threats [J].
Loh, Hui Shan ;
Zhou, Qingji ;
Thai, Vinh V. ;
Wong, Yiik Diew ;
Yuen, Kum Fai .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 :53-62