Assessing the deviation from the inverse square law for orthovoltage beams with closed-ended applicators

被引:18
作者
Graefe, James [1 ,2 ]
Poirier, Yannick [2 ,3 ]
Jacso, Ferenc [1 ]
Khan, Rao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hong-Wei [4 ,5 ]
Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Phys & Astron, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Oncol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Cent Alberta Canc Ctr, Red Deer, AB, Canada
关键词
orthovoltage; extended source-to-surface distance; inverse square law; dose computation; kVDoseCalc; RAY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4893
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In this report, we quantify the divergence from the inverse square law (ISL) of the beam output as a function of distance (standoff) from closed-ended applicators for a modern clinical orthovoltage unit. The divergence is clinically significant exceeding 3% at a 1.2 cm distance for 4 x 4 and 10 x 10 cm(2) closed-ended applicators. For all investigated cases, the measured dose falloff is more rapid than that predicted by the ISL and, therefore, causes a systematic underdose when using the ISL for dose calculations at extended SSD. The observed divergence from the ISL in closed-ended applicators can be explained by the end-plate scattering contribution not accounted for in the ISL calculation. The standoff measurements were also compared to the predictions from a home-built kV dose computation algorithm, kVDoseCalc. The kVDoseCalc computation predicted a more rapid falloff with distance than observed experimentally. The computation and measurements agree to within 1.1% for standoff distances of 3 cm or less for 4 x 4 cm(2) and 10 x 10 cm(2) field sizes. The overall agreement is within 2.3% for all field sizes and standoff distances measured. No significant deviation from the ISL was observed for open-ended applicators for standoff distances up to 10 cm.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 366
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Attix F.H., 2004, Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry
[2]  
Berger M. J., 2013, STOPPING POWER RANGE
[3]   Performance assessment of the Gulmay D3300 kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit [J].
Evans, PA ;
Moloney, AJ ;
Mountford, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (882) :537-547
[4]  
Furstoss C, 2013, CANADIAN PARTNERSHIP
[5]  
Khan F, 2010, PHYS RAD THERAPY
[6]   EFFECT OF AIR SPACE ON DEPTH DOSE IN ELECTRON-BEAM THERAPY [J].
KHAN, FM ;
SEWCHAND, W ;
LEVITT, SH .
RADIOLOGY, 1978, 126 (01) :249-251
[7]   A hybrid approach for rapid, accurate, and direct kilovoltage radiation dose calculations in CT voxel space [J].
Kouznetsov, Alexei ;
Tambasco, Mauro .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) :1378-1388
[8]   Characteristics of orthovoltage x-ray therapy beams at extended SSD for applicators with end plates [J].
Li, XA ;
Salhani, D ;
Ma, CM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (02) :357-370
[9]   AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology [J].
Ma, CM ;
Coffey, CW ;
DeWerd, LA ;
Liu, C ;
Nath, R ;
Seltzer, SM ;
Seuntjens, JP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (06) :868-893
[10]   Experimental validation of a kilovoltage x-ray source model for computing imaging dose [J].
Poirier, Yannick ;
Kouznetsov, Alexei ;
Koger, Brandon ;
Tambasco, Mauro .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (04)