共 2 条
Assessing hygiene proficiency on organic and conventional pig farms regarding pork safety:: A pilot study in Finland
被引:9
|作者:
Siekkinen, K. -M.
Nuotio, L.
Ranta, J.
Laukkanen, R.
Hellstrom, S.
Korkeala, H.
Maijala, R.
机构:
[1] Natl Vet & Food Res Inst, Dept Risk Assessment, EELA, FIN-00581 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Vet Med, Dept Food & Environm Hyg, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词:
hygiene proficiency;
hygiene scores;
pigs;
pre-harvest;
pork safety;
public health;
D O I:
10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.017
中图分类号:
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号:
0905 ;
摘要:
A key element in the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CA-P) will be a single farm payment system that is linked to compliance with rules on, for instance hygiene standards. However, there are no recommended methods for assessing the hygiene proficiency of pig production farms. The present study was undertaken to develop a method for this purpose. A first implementation was done on pilot scale; with a set of both conventional and organic pig farms (N=15). Fifty hygiene-related factors were selected, especially with reference to the possible proliferation of enteric pathogens Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. The factors were allocated into 8 evaluation categories: (1) general production management, (2) animal density, (3) the outdoor area for pigs, (4) pest and pet animals, (5) general hygiene in the piggery, (6) pen hygiene, (7) feed production hygiene, and (8) feeding hygiene. A farm questionnaire and a supplementary on-site observation form were devised, and one arbitrary scale of hygiene points assigned for each factor. In addition to the mailed questionnaires, one person subsequently visited all the farms, perused the questionnaire with the owners and completed the observation form. The hygiene scores of the farms in each evaluation category were compared both without weighting and with weighting based on expert opinions. The method proved to be feasible and applicable to different types of production. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 202
页数:10
相关论文