Monitoring of anticoagulant effects of direct thrombin inhibitors

被引:52
|
作者
Fenyvesi, T [1 ]
Jörg, I [1 ]
Harenberg, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Med 4, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
来源
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS | 2002年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
thrombin inhibitors; ecarin clotting time; prothrombinase-induced clotting time; hirudin; argatroban; melagatran;
D O I
10.1055/s-2002-34305
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is limited by poor linearity and reproducibility. Recently, direct prothrombin activation methods have been developed for coagulation analysis: ecarin clotting time (ECT) and prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PICT). Laboratory monitoring of the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin, argatroban, and melagatran was analyzed and compared with monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH). Plasma samples of six healthy donors were spiked with lepirudin and argatroban extending to 3000 ng/mL, melagatran extending to 1000 ng/mL, and UFH up to 0.48 IU/mL. Clotting times of aPTT (two reagents), ECT, PICT, and prothrombin time were determined in a KC 10, a micro instrument. At 3000 ng/mL ECT values were 339.1 +/- 25.0 seconds with lepirudin and 457.5 +/- 29.5 seconds with argatroban. ECT was 586.0 +/- 38.2 seconds with 1000 ng/mL melagatran. The PICT method provided clotting times of 137.0 +/- 8.4 seconds with UFH, 128.0 +/- 23.4 seconds with lepirudin, and 151 +/- 23.9 seconds with argatroban, and 153.5 +/- 9.9 seconds with melagatran, with the concentrations mentioned. ECT is more sensitive to therapeutic drug concentration ranges than aPTT (prolongations of 3-7 versus 2-3). PICT yields comparable results with direct thrombin inhibitors and UFH. This method could therefore be suitable for monitoring both drug groups.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct thrombin inhibitors
    Kaplan, KL
    Francis, CW
    SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 39 (03) : 187 - 196
  • [22] Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
    O'Brien, P. Joshua
    Mureebe, Leila
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 17 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [23] DIRECT THROMBIN INHIBITORS
    MAFFRAND, JP
    NOUVELLE REVUE FRANCAISE D HEMATOLOGIE, 1992, 34 (06): : 405 - 419
  • [24] Moving Toward a More Ideal Anticoagulant The Oral Direct Thrombin and Factor Xa Inhibitors
    King, Christopher S.
    Holley, Aaron B.
    Moores, Lisa K.
    CHEST, 2013, 143 (04) : 1106 - 1116
  • [25] Presence of direct thrombin inhibitors can affect the results and interpretation of lupus anticoagulant testing
    Genzen, JR
    Miller, JL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 124 (04) : 586 - 593
  • [26] COMPARISON OF ANTICOAGULANT AND ANTITHROMBOTIC ACTIVITY OF THROMBIN INHIBITORS
    BROERSMA, RJ
    NEISES, B
    HEMINGER, EF
    KUTCHER, LW
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1992, 6 (04): : A1319 - A1319
  • [27] COMPARISON OF THE ANTICOAGULANT AND ANTITHROMBOTIC EFFECTS OF SYNTHETIC THROMBIN AND FACTOR-XA INHIBITORS
    HAUPTMANN, J
    KAISER, B
    NOWAK, G
    STURZEBECHER, J
    MARKWARDT, F
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1990, 63 (02) : 220 - 223
  • [28] Evaluation of assay performance monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors with TECHNOCLOT® DTI in plasma samples contaminated with indirect thrombin inhibitors
    Wagner, L.
    Binder, N. B.
    Leitner, M.
    Riha, M.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 11 : 836 - 837
  • [29] Anticoagulation monitoring Part 1: Warfarin and parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors
    Spinler, SA
    Nutescu, EA
    Smythe, MA
    Wittkowsky, AK
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 39 (06) : 1049 - 1055
  • [30] Evaluation of assay performance monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors with TECHNOCLOT® DTI
    Leitner, M.
    Riha, M.
    Kaufmann, V.
    Mager, J.
    Geiter, S.
    Wagner, L.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2012, 129 : S187 - S187