Factors affecting residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation

被引:0
作者
Zanetti, D. [1 ]
Nassif, N. [2 ]
Redaelli De Zinis, L. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Audiol, IRCSS Policlin Ca Granda, I-20100 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Spedali Civili, Paediat Otorhinolaryngol Dept, Brescia, Italy
关键词
Cochlear implant; Residual hearing; Insertion technique; Cochleostomy; Array; Electrode; ELECTRIC-ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; LOW-FREQUENCY HEARING; ROUND WINDOW; AUDITORY-SYSTEM; SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SOFT-SURGERY; CONSERVATION; INSERTION; COCHLEOSTOMY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The likelihood of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation (CI) is related to surgical factors such as type of cochleostomy (trans-fenestral vs. promontorial), use of lubricants and protective drugs, and device-related factors such as shape, length and flexibility of the array. We investigated the impact of these factors on the hearing preservation rate in adults and children with conventional audiological indications to CI. Eighty-two children aged 1-9 years and 73 adults (16-79 years) received a CI in the right (59%) or left ear (41%). An anterior-inferior promontorial cochleostomy was performed in 143 ears (92%); a trans-fenestral approach was used in 12 (8%). A perimodiolar electrode was implanted in 144 ears (93%), and a straight electrode in the remaining 11 (7%). Overall, some post-operative hearing was retained in 39% of ears. The rate of preservation was higher at the low than at the high frequencies. When correlated with age, side of implant, implant model and type of cochleostomy, the mean threshold variations did not reach statistical significance for any of these variables. A slight trend in favour of better residual hearing preservation in children vs. adults was seen, especially at lower frequencies.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 441
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation - fact or fantasy? [J].
Adunka, OF ;
Pillsbury, HC ;
Kiefer, J .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2006, 126 (05) :475-482
[2]   Effect of Preoperative Residual Hearing on Speech Perception After Cochlear Implantation [J].
Adunka, Oliver F. ;
Buss, Emily ;
Clark, Marcia S. ;
Pillsbury, Harold C. ;
Buchman, Craig A. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (11) :2044-2049
[3]   Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation [J].
Balkany, Thomas J. ;
Connell, Sarah S. ;
Hodges, Annelle V. ;
Payne, Stacy L. ;
Telischi, Fred F. ;
Eshraghi, Adrien A. ;
Angeli, Simon I. ;
Germani, Ross ;
Messiah, Sarah ;
Arheart, Kristopher L. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (08) :1083-1088
[4]  
Barriat S, 2010, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V67, P6, DOI 10.1159/000262592
[5]   Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques [J].
Berrettini, S. ;
Forli, F. ;
Passetti, S. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2008, 122 (03) :246-252
[6]  
Berrettini S, 2013, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V33, P56
[7]  
Briggs Robert J S, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P42, DOI 10.1159/000095613
[8]   Preserved Low-Frequency Hearing Following 20-mm Cochlear Implantation [J].
Brown, Kevin D. ;
Melton, Myles F. ;
Shonfield, Hannah ;
Kraskin, Michelle ;
Wolf, Jennifer .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) :240-243
[9]   A Retrospective Analysis of the Contribution of Reported Factors in Cochlear Implantation on Hearing Preservation Outcomes [J].
Causon, Andrew ;
Verschuur, Carl ;
Newman, Tracey A. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (07) :1137-1145
[10]   Factors influencing the efficacy of round window dexamethasone protection of residual hearing post-cochlear implant surgery [J].
Chang, Andrew ;
Eastwood, Hayden ;
Sly, David ;
James, David ;
Richardson, Rachael ;
O'Leary, Stephen .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2009, 255 (1-2) :67-72