Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities

被引:184
作者
Lohr, Kathleen N. [1 ]
Zebrack, Bradley J. [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, Social & Stat Sci, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Bioethics; Clinical practice; Health status; Outcomes measurement; Patient care; Quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATUS ASSESSMENT; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; INTERVIEWER; SETTINGS; CANCER; COMMUNICATION; ASSESSMENTS; OBSTACLES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-008-9413-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduce and explore issues at an international conference about the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice. Review of salient literature, clinical and personal experiences, conference presentations and discussions, and post-conference comments from outside experts. PROs (information from patients about a health condition and its management) have been assessed through self-reports for at least four decades. Traditional applications are in clinical and health services research. Uses in clinical practice, although increasing, are less common and more challenging. PROs can enhance the understanding of patients' experiences and responses to therapy and inform clinical practice. We pose and discuss four main questions: (1) Will clinicians accept PRO measures? (2) Will clinicians use PRO measures? (3) Will measuring PROs actually improve those outcomes? (4) Will PROs be perceived as having other, less salutary purposes? A patient-centered perspective on PRO measurement presents issues about the extent to which PROs can accurately capture patient experiences and assess psychosocial and environmental factors that influence communication with clinicians and eventual outcomes. We end with comments about the intersection of PROs and bioethics, noting contributions that PROs may make to beneficence, patient autonomy, and distributive justice.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条