Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: A trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression

被引:454
作者
Hollister, Jesse D. [1 ]
Gaut, Brandon S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; DNA METHYLATION; RECOMBINATION RATE; CAENORHABDITIS-ELEGANS; ECTOPIC RECOMBINATION; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; COPY NUMBER; ZEA-MAYS;
D O I
10.1101/gr.091678.109
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitous genomic parasites. The deleterious consequences of the presence and activity of TEs have fueled debate about the evolutionary forces countering their expansion. Purifying selection is thought to purge TE insertions from the genome, and TE sequences are targeted by hosts for epigenetic silencing. However, the interplay between epigenetic and evolutionary forces countering TE expansion remains unexplored. Here we analyze genomic, epigenetic, and population genetic data from Arabidopsis thaliana to yield three observations. First, gene expression is negatively correlated with the density of methylated TEs. Second, the signature of purifying selection is detectable for methylated TEs near genes but not for unmethylated TEs or for TEs far from genes. Third, TE insertions are distributed by age and methylation status, such that older, methylated TEs are farther from genes. Based on these observations, we present a model in which host silencing of TEs near genes has deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression, resulting in the preferential loss of methylated TEs from gene-rich chromosomal regions. This mechanism implies an evolutionary tradeoff in which the benefit of TE silencing imposes a fitness cost via deleterious effects on the expression of nearby genes.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1428
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[11]   Breeding systems and genome evolution [J].
Charlesworth, D ;
Wright, SI .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 11 (06) :685-690
[12]  
CRESSE AD, 1995, GENETICS, V140, P315
[13]   Transcription-related mutations and GC content drive variation in nucleotide substitution rates across the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata [J].
DeRose-Wilson, Leah J. ;
Gaut, Brandon S. .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 7 (1)
[14]  
Duret L, 2000, GENETICS, V156, P1661
[15]   RNA Polymerase IV Functions in Paramutation in Zea mays [J].
Erhard, Karl F., Jr. ;
Stonaker, Jennifer L. ;
Parkinson, Susan E. ;
Lim, Jana P. ;
Hale, Christopher J. ;
Hollick, Jay B. .
SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5918) :1201-1205
[16]  
Feschotte C, 2003, GENETICS, V163, P747
[17]  
Finnegan D.J., 1992, The genome of Drosophila melanogaster, P1096, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-450990-0.50010-1
[18]   Opinion - Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes [J].
Gaut, Brandon S. ;
Wright, Stephen I. ;
Rizzon, Carene ;
Dvorak, Jan ;
Anderson, Lorinda K. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2007, 8 (01) :77-84
[19]   SEQUENCE EVOLUTION WITHIN POPULATIONS UNDER MULTIPLE TYPES OF MUTATION [J].
GOLDING, GB ;
AQUADRO, CF ;
LANGLEY, CH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1986, 83 (02) :427-431
[20]   Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium [J].
Hawkins, Jennifer S. ;
Kim, HyeRan ;
Nason, John D. ;
Wing, Rod A. ;
Wendel, Jonathan F. .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (10) :1252-1261