Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis

被引:74
作者
Lee, Jean W. [1 ]
Hall, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES | 2009年 / 877卷 / 13期
关键词
Method validation; Protein biomarkers; Drug development; Clinical diagnosis/prognosis; Ligand binding assay; Mass spectrometric method; MASS-SPECTROMETRIC IMMUNOASSAY; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION; TYPE-2; DIABETES-MELLITUS; LIGAND-BINDING ASSAYS; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; QUALITY-CONTROL; BREAST-CANCER; ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; BIOLOGICAL-FLUIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.11.022
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein biomarkers are used for various purposes in drug development and clinical diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, a fit-for-purpose method validation approach is discussed that fulfills the needs of exploratory and advanced applications in both the pharmaceutical and diagnostic arenas. Method validation for protein biomarkers is typically applied to ligand binding assays (LBA) although hyphenated mass spectrometric methods can be used as adjunct methodologies to confirm LBA specificity or provide valuable information during early discovery or demonstrative phases of a novel biomarker. Pre-analytic variables of protein biomarkers, such as the purpose of the intended application, analyte(s), biological matrix, availability of reference standard, calibrator matrix, assay platform, and sample collection/handling, must be considered in any method development and validation plan. Method validation for exploratory applications involves basic experiments for assay range finding, accuracy and precision, selectivity, specificity, and minimal stability. For advanced method validation, more rigorous tests with a wider scope are performed. These tests include additional patient population ranges, more runs on accuracy and precision from multiple analysts/reagent lots/instruments, selectivity and specificity tests using patient samples, and stability tests subjected to conceivable conditions over long-term use. Differences in biomarker method validation for drug development vs. clinical diagnosis and issues of using developmental commercial kits are discussed. The co-development of biomarkers for drug development and diagnostics presents collaborative opportunities between the pharmaceutical and diagnostic sectors. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1271
页数:13
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins [J].
Anderson, L ;
Hunter, CL .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2006, 5 (04) :573-588
[2]  
[Anonymous], DRUG DIAGN IN PRESS
[3]   The effects of mass accuracy, data acquisition speed, and search algorithm choice on peptide identification rates in phosphoproteomics [J].
Bakalarski, Corey E. ;
Haas, Wilhelm ;
Dephoure, Noah E. ;
Gygi, Steven P. .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 389 (05) :1409-1419
[4]   Preanalytical influences in clinical proteomic studies: Raising awareness of fundamental issues in sample banking [J].
Banks, Rosamonde E. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (01) :6-7
[5]   Cancer biomarker validation: Standards and process - Roles for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [J].
Barker, PE .
EPIGENETICS IN CANCER PREVENTION: EARLY DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2003, 983 :142-150
[6]   Absolute quantification of the model biomarker prostate-specific antigen in serum by LC-MS/MS using protein cleavage and isotope dilution mass spectrometry [J].
Barnidge, DR ;
Goodmanson, MK ;
Klee, GG ;
Muddiman, DC .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2004, 3 (03) :644-652
[7]   Summary report of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of serum tumour markers in breast cancer: 2000 [J].
Basuyau, JP ;
Blanc-Vincent, MP ;
Bidart, JM ;
Daver, A ;
Deneux, L ;
Eche, N ;
Gory-Delabaere, G ;
Pichon, MF ;
Riedinger, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (Suppl 1) :S32-S34
[8]  
Berger Joel, 2002, Diabetes Technol Ther, V4, P163, DOI 10.1089/15209150260007381
[9]  
BJORNSSON TD, 2005, EUR PHARM REV, V1, P17
[10]  
Bonini P, 2002, CLIN CHEM, V48, P691