Neurological examination in patients undergoing sedation with propofol: a descriptive study

被引:2
|
作者
Ordas-Bandera, Carlos M. [1 ]
Sanchez-Marcos, Carolina [2 ]
Janeiro-Lumbreras, David [3 ]
Jose Jimenez-Martin, M. [3 ]
Muniz-Castrillo, Sergio [1 ]
Luz Cuadrado-Perez, M.
Porta-Etessam, Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Serv Neurol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Serv Med Interna, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Serv Cuidados Intens, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Anaesthesia; Brainstem reflexes; Coma state; Neurologic examination; Propofol; Pupillary reflex; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; EYE-MOVEMENTS; SLEEP; MECHANISMS; STATE; COMA;
D O I
10.33588/rn.5812.2014028
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The neurological examination is a resource used in evaluating patients who are in coma. Anaesthesia can be a factor that exerts an influence on the findings. We evaluated the examination of the comatose patient in the case of patients anaesthetised with propofol in order to define its clinical value. Patients and methods. A prospective study was conducted among those who had undergone heart surgery in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital during the months of April and May 2011. Aspects that were analysed were the examination of the anaesthetic coma, pharmacological or medical factors that can have an influence and a full neurological examination following recovery. Patients with previous neurological symptoms were excluded. Results. Thirty patients were selected (16 males and 14 females); mean age: 72 +/- 10 years. All the patients were sedated with propofol. During sedation, 17 (46.7%) presented unreactive pupils. No spontaneous eye movements were observed in 100% of the sample. Ocular alterations in primary position were observed in 23.3% of them. Oculocephalic reflexes were absent in 93.3% and oculovestibular reflexes, in 100%; the corneal reflex, was absent in 70% (with asymmetry), as was the ciliospinal reflex, in 83.3%. The algesic motor response was absent in 93.3%, as were the cutaneous plantar extensor reflexes, in 20%; and 66.7% were indifferent. Following anaesthesia, the neurological examination was normal in 80%, there were slight orientation impairments in 16.7% and a hemispheric syndrome was found in one patient. Conclusions. Anaesthesia with propofol alters the reversible cutaneous-plantar, pupillary, trunk and motor response reflexes on withdrawing sedation. The alterations may be asymmetrical. Neurological examinations should not be used in the case of patients sedated with propofol in order to make clinical decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 540
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room
    Akhondzadeh, Reza
    Ghomeishi, Ali
    Nesioonpour, Sholeh
    Nourizade, Sanaz
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 39 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [32] A retrospective analysis of benzodiazepine sedation vs. propofol anaesthesia in 252 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Lordan, Jeffrey T.
    Woods, Justin
    Keeling, Peter
    Paterson, Iain M.
    HPB, 2011, 13 (03) : 174 - 177
  • [33] Effects of deep sedation on cardiac electrophysiology in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of supraventricular tachycardia: impact of propofol and ketamine
    Wutzler, Alexander
    Huemer, Martin
    Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
    Parwani, Abdul Shokor
    Attanasio, Philipp
    Tscholl, Verena
    Haverkamp, Wilhelm
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (07): : 1019 - 1024
  • [34] Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery under sub-Tenon's anesthesia
    Ghali, Ashraf
    Mahfouz, Abdul Kader
    Ihanamaki, Tapio
    El Btarny, Ashraf M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [35] Target-controlled propofol infusion for sedation in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Park, J. Y.
    Park, S. J.
    Choi, S. U.
    Shin, H. W.
    Lee, H. W.
    Lim, H. J.
    Yoon, S. M.
    Chang, S. H.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 35 (06) : 773 - 780
  • [36] Safety Analysis of Bariatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy with Non-Anesthesia Administered Propofol Sedation
    Tyler McVay
    John C. Fang
    Linda Taylor
    Alexander Au
    Wesley Williams
    Angela P. Presson
    Ragheed Al-Dulaimi
    Eric Volckmann
    Anna Ibele
    Obesity Surgery, 2017, 27 : 1501 - 1507
  • [37] The periprocedural respiratory safety of propofol sedation in patients with a motor neuron disease undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion
    van Neerven, Giel J. L.
    Schelling, Willem-Jan
    van den Borne, Katrien
    Bijleveld, Kim
    Baars, Arlinda
    Flink, Hajo
    Gilissen, Lennard P. L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 461
  • [38] Effectiveness and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Li, Dongbin
    Wang, Yu
    Xing, Yang
    Zhao, Zicen
    Chang, Liya
    Leng, Yufang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (06) : 1371 - 1380
  • [39] Safety Analysis of Bariatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy with Non-Anesthesia Administered Propofol Sedation
    McVay, Tyler
    Fang, John C.
    Taylor, Linda
    Au, Alexander
    Williams, Wesley
    Presson, Angela P.
    Al-Dulaimi, Ragheed
    Volckmann, Eric
    Ibele, Anna
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (06) : 1501 - 1507
  • [40] Ventilatory Effect of Midazolam in Propofol Deep Sedation for Hepatic Tumor Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Procedure
    Sripunjan, Krongthip
    Sombood, Pattharaporn
    Vichitvejpaisal, Phongtara
    Amornyotin, Somchai
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2021, 12 (01) : 89 - 99