Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium

被引:9
作者
Goderis, Geert [1 ]
Colman, Elien [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Irusta, Lucia Alvarez [5 ]
Van Hecke, Ann [3 ,4 ]
Petre, Benoit [6 ]
Devroey, Dirk [7 ]
Van Deun, Elias [8 ]
Faes, Kristof [7 ]
Charlier, Nathan [6 ]
Verhaeghe, Nick [7 ,9 ]
Remmen, Roy [2 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Sermeus, Walter [8 ]
Macq, Jean [5 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Primary & Interdisciplinary Care ELIZA, Ctr Gen Practice, Doornstr, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Univ Ctr Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Hlth & Soc IRSS, Clos Chapelle Aux Champs, Belgium
[6] Univ Liege, Publ Hlth Dept, Quartier Hop,Ave Hippocrate, Liege, Belgium
[7] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Family Med & Chron Care, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Inst Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
[9] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Grp Social & Econ Policy & Social Inclus, Pk Str, Leuven, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE | 2020年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
realist evaluation; mixed methods; integrated care; chronic conditions; health systems research; DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCES; QUALITY-OF-CARE; TRIPLE AIM; POPULATION HEALTH; OLDER-ADULTS; SYSTEM; IMPACT; COMPLEXITY; PROGRAMS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5334/ijic.5435
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The twelve Integrated Care Program pilot projects (ICPs) created by the government plan ` Integrated Care for Better Health' aim to achieve four outcome types (the Quadruple Aim) for people with chronic diseases in Belgium: improved population health, improved patient and provider experiences and improved cost efficiency. The aim of this article is to present the development of a mixed methods realist evaluation of this large-scale, whole system change programme. Methods: A scientific team was commissioned to co-design and implement an evaluation protocol in close collaboration with the government, the ICPs and several other involved stakeholders. Results: A protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation was developed to gain insights into the mechanisms that foster successful results in ICPs. The qualitative evaluation proposed will be based on the document analysis of yearly ICP progress reports, selected case studies and focus group interviews with stakeholders. Processes and outcomes of all the projects will be monitored using indicators based on administrative data on population health and the quality and costs of care. A yearly survey will be organized to collect data on patient-reported outcomes and experiences and on provider-reported measures of inter-professional collaboration and proper wellbeing. Using both quantitative and qualitative data, we will develop theories about the mechanisms and the associated contextual factors that lead to integrated care and the Quadruple Aim outcomes. Discussion: The objective of this study is to deliver policy recommendations on strategies and best practices to improve care integration in Belgium and to implement a sustainable monitoring system that serves both policy makers and the stakeholders within the ICPs. Some challenges due to the large scale of the project and the multiple stakeholders involved may impede the successful implementation of this proposal.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Adriaenssens J, INTEGRATED EVIDENCE
  • [2] Allin S., 2007, Measuring inequalities in access to health care: a review of the indices: research note for the European Commission
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, WHO global strategy on people-centered and Integrated health services: Interim report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, DRAWING PROCESS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, VALUE HEALTHCARE LAY, P1
  • [6] Evaluation of integrated care services in Catalonia: population-based and service-based real-life deployment protocols
    Baltaxe, Erik
    Cano, Isaac
    Herranz, Carmen
    Barberan-Garcia, Anael
    Hernandez, Carme
    Alonso, Albert
    Jose Arguis, Maria
    Bescos, Cristina
    Burgos, Felip
    Cleries, Montserrat
    Carles Contel, Joan
    de Batlle, Jordi
    Islam, Kamrul
    Kaye, Rachelle
    Lahr, Maarten
    Martinez-Palli, Graciela
    Miralles, Felip
    Moharra, Montserrat
    Monterde, David
    Piera, Jordi
    Rios, Jose
    Rodriguez, Nuria
    Ron, Reut
    Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
    Salas, Tomas
    Santaeugenia, Sebastia
    Schonenberg, Helen
    Solans, Oscar
    Torres, Gerard
    Vargiu, Eloisa
    Vela, Emili
    Roca, Josep
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [7] The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence
    Baxter, Susan
    Johnson, Maxine
    Chambers, Duncan
    Sutton, Anthea
    Goyder, Elizabeth
    Booth, Andrew
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [8] Bazeley P., 2018, Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research, P71
  • [9] Bernstein A, 2003, HLTH CARE AM TRENDS, DOI [10.1037/e309002005-001, DOI 10.1037/E309002005-001]
  • [10] Large-System Transformation in Health Care: A Realist Review
    Best, Allan
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    Lewis, Steven
    Saul, Jessie E.
    Carroll, Simon
    Bitz, Jennifer
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2012, 90 (03) : 421 - 456