Usefulness of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate between pilocytic astrocytomas and high-grade gliomas: a multicenter study in Japan

被引:18
作者
Kikuchi, Kazufumi [1 ]
Hiwatashi, Akio [1 ]
Togao, Osamu [1 ]
Yamashita, Koji [1 ]
Kamei, Ryotaro [1 ]
Kitajima, Mika [2 ]
Kanoto, Masafumi [3 ]
Takahashi, Hiroto [4 ]
Uchiyama, Yusuke [5 ]
Harada, Masafumi [6 ]
Shinohara, Yuki [7 ]
Yoshiura, Takashi [8 ]
Wakata, Yuki [9 ]
Honda, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Higashi Ku, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
[3] Yamagata Univ, Div Diagnost Radiol, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med Sci Med, Yamagata, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[5] Kurume Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
[6] Univ Tokushima, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Radiol & Radiat Oncol, Tokushima, Japan
[7] Tottori Univ, Div Radiol, Dept Pathophysiol & Therapeut Sci, Tottori, Japan
[8] Kagoshima Univ, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Dept Radiol, Kagoshima, Japan
[9] Hyogo Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Pilocytic astrocytoma; High-grade glioma; Multicenter study; Perfusion-weighted imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; BRAIN-TUMORS; ADULT; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-018-1991-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Imaging findings of pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) vary widely, sometimes resembling those of high-grade glioma (HGG). This study aimed to identify the imaging parameters that can be used to differentiate PA from HGG. Altogether, 60 patients with PAs and 138 patients with HGGs were included in the study. Tumor properties and the presence of hydrocephalus, peritumoral edema, and dissemination were evaluated. We also measured the maximum relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF(max)) and volume (rCBV(max)) and determined the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(min)) in the tumor's solid components. The relative T1 (rT1), T2 (rT2), and contrast-enhanced T1 (rCE-T1) intensity values were evaluated. Parameters were compared between PAs and HGGs using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also used to evaluate these imaging parameters. A value of P < .05 was considered to indicate significance. Intratumoral hemorrhage and calcification were observed in 10.0% and 21.7% of PAs, respectively. The rCBF(max) and rCBV(max) values were significantly lower in PAs (0.50 +/- 0.35, 1.82 +/- 1.21) than those in HGGs (2.98 +/- 1.80, 9.54 +/- 6.88) (P < .0001, P = .0002, respectively). The ADC(min) values were significantly higher in PAs (1.36 +/- 0.56 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than those in HGGs (0.86 +/- 0.37 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < .0001). ROC analysis showed that the best diagnostic performance was achieved with rCBF(max). The rCBF(max), rCBV(max), and ADC(min) can differentiate PAs from HGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 401
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usefulness of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate between pilocytic astrocytomas and high-grade gliomas: a multicenter study in Japan
    Kazufumi Kikuchi
    Akio Hiwatashi
    Osamu Togao
    Koji Yamashita
    Ryotaro Kamei
    Mika Kitajima
    Masafumi Kanoto
    Hiroto Takahashi
    Yusuke Uchiyama
    Masafumi Harada
    Yuki Shinohara
    Takashi Yoshiura
    Yuki Wakata
    Hiroshi Honda
    Neuroradiology, 2018, 60 : 391 - 401
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging of pilocytic astrocytomas: Usefulness of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for differentiation from high-grade gliomas
    Murakami, R.
    Hirai, T.
    Kitajima, M.
    Fukuoka, H.
    Toya, R.
    Nakamura, H.
    Kuratsu, J.
    Yamashita, Y.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (04) : 462 - 467
  • [3] Use of a high b-value for diffusion weighted imaging of peritumoral regions to differentiate high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases
    Han, Chengkun
    Huang, Shumin
    Guo, Jianfeng
    Zhuang, Xiongjie
    Han, Haiwei
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (01) : 80 - 86
  • [4] Perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging parameters: Comparison between pre- and postbiopsy MRI for high-grade glioma
    Kurokawa, Ryo
    Baba, Akira
    Kurokawa, Mariko
    Capizzano, Aristides
    Ota, Yoshiaki
    Kim, John
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    Moritani, Toshio
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (35) : E30183
  • [5] Multiparametric differentiation of intracranial central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma using diffusion-, perfusion-, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and spectroscopy
    Rai, Santosh
    Raeesa, Fathima
    Kamath, Mayur
    Rai, Sharada
    Pai, Muralidhar
    Prabhu, Sonali
    WEST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [6] Comparison between CT and MR in perfusion imaging assessment of high-grade gliomas
    De Simone, M.
    Muccio, C. F.
    Pagnotta, S. M.
    Esposito, G.
    Cianfoni, A.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 140 - 151
  • [7] Comparison between CT and MR in perfusion imaging assessment of high-grade gliomas
    De Simone, M.
    Muccio, C. F.
    Pagnotta, S. M.
    Esposito, G.
    Cianfoni, A.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (01): : 140 - 151
  • [8] Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases: a comparison of five diffusion-weighted MRI models
    Mao, Jiaji
    Zeng, Weike
    Zhang, Qinyuan
    Yang, Zehong
    Yan, Xu
    Zhang, Huiting
    Wang, Mengzhu
    Yang, Guang
    Zhou, Minxiong
    Shen, Jun
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases: a comparison of five diffusion-weighted MRI models
    Jiaji Mao
    Weike Zeng
    Qinyuan Zhang
    Zehong Yang
    Xu Yan
    Huiting Zhang
    Mengzhu Wang
    Guang Yang
    Minxiong Zhou
    Jun Shen
    BMC Medical Imaging, 20
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted imaging-based probabilistic segmentation of high- and low-proliferative areas in high-grade gliomas
    Simon, Dirk
    Fritzsche, Klaus H.
    Thieke, Christian
    Klein, Jan
    Parzer, Peter
    Weber, Marc-Andre
    Stieltjes, Bram
    CANCER IMAGING, 2012, 12 (01) : 89 - 99