What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?

被引:99
作者
Haldorsen, Ingfrid S. [1 ,2 ]
Lura, Njal [1 ]
Blaakaer, Jan [3 ]
Fischerova, Daniela [4 ]
Werner, Henrica M. J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Mohn Med Imaging & Visualizat Ctr, Jonas Liesvei 65,Postbox 7800, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Sect Radiol, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Odense, Denmark
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Gen Univ Hosp Prague, Fac Med 1, Gynecol Oncol Ctr,Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Sci, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Cervical cancer; Transvaginal ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Positron emission tomography; Imaging biomarkers; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; PREDICTING PARAMETRIAL INVASION; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; EARLY-STAGE; CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s11912-019-0824-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewFor uterine cervical cancer, the recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2018) incorporates imaging and pathology assessments in its staging. In this review we summarize the reported staging performances of conventional and novel imaging methods and provide an overview of promising novel imaging methods relevant for cervical cancer patient care.Recent FindingsDiagnostic imaging during the primary diagnostic work-up is recommended to better assess tumor extent and metastatic disease and is now reflected in the 2018 FIGO stages 3C1 and 3C2 (positive pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes). For pretreatment local staging, imaging by transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound (TVS, TRS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is instrumental to define pelvic tumor extent, including a more accurate assessment of tumor size, stromal invasion depth, and parametrial invasion. In locally advanced cervical cancer, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) or computed tomography (CT) is recommended, since the identification of metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases has therapeutic consequences. Furthermore, novel imaging techniques offer visualization of microstructural and functional tumor characteristics, reportedly linked to clinical phenotype, thus with a potential for further improving risk stratification and individualization of treatment.SummaryDiagnostic imaging by MRI/TVS/TRS and PET-CT/CT is instrumental for pretreatment staging in uterine cervical cancer and guides optimal treatment strategy. Novel imaging techniques may also provide functional biomarkers with potential relevance for developing more targeted treatment strategies in cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome [J].
Andersen, Erlend K. F. ;
Hole, Knut Hakon ;
Lund, Kjersti V. ;
Sundfor, Kolbein ;
Kristensen, Gunnar B. ;
Lyng, Heidi ;
Malinen, Eirik .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (01) :117-122
[2]   Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Cervical Cancers: Temporal Percentile Screening of Contrast Enhancement Identifies Parameters for Prediction of Chemoradioresistance [J].
Andersen, Erlend K. F. ;
Hole, Knut Hakon ;
Lund, Kjersti V. ;
Sundfor, Kolbein ;
Kristensen, Gunnar B. ;
Lyng, Heidi ;
Malinen, Eirik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (03) :E485-E492
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ESGO ESTRO ESP CERV
[4]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework [J].
Atkinson, AJ ;
Colburn, WA ;
DeGruttola, VG ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Hoth, DF ;
Oates, JA ;
Peck, CC ;
Schooley, RT ;
Spilker, BA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (03) :89-95
[5]   Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology [J].
Balleyguier, Corinne ;
Sala, E. ;
Da Cunha, T. ;
Bergman, A. ;
Brkljacic, B. ;
Danza, F. ;
Forstner, R. ;
Hamm, B. ;
Kubik-Huch, R. ;
Lopez, C. ;
Manfredi, R. ;
McHugo, J. ;
Oleaga, L. ;
Togashi, K. ;
Kinkel, K. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) :1102-1110
[6]   PET and PET-CT imaging of gynecological malignancies: present role and future promise [J].
Basu, Sandip ;
Li, Geming ;
Alavi, Abass .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (01) :75-96
[7]  
Becker AS, 2017, ACTA RADIOL OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1177/2058460117729574
[8]   Radiological Assessment of Gynecologic Malignancies [J].
Bell, Daniel J. ;
Pannu, Harpreet K. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 38 (01) :45-+
[9]   SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF RECURRENCE IN CERVICAL-CANCER METASTATIC TO PERIAORTIC LYMPH-NODES - (A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY) [J].
BERMAN, ML ;
KEYS, H ;
CREASMAN, W ;
DISAIA, P ;
BUNDY, B ;
BLESSING, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 19 (01) :8-16
[10]   Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Berek, Jonathan S. ;
Cuello Fredes, Mauricio ;
Denny, Lynette A. ;
Grenman, Seija ;
Karunaratne, Kanishka ;
Kehoe, Sean T. ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Olawaiye, Alexander B. ;
Prat, Jaime ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 145 (01) :129-135