Dosimetric comparison of head and neck cancer patients planned with multivendor volumetric modulated arc therapy technology

被引:7
作者
Kathirvel, Murugesan [1 ,2 ]
Subramani, Vellaiyan [2 ,3 ]
Subramanian, V. S. [1 ,2 ]
Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai [1 ]
Arun, Gandhi [1 ,2 ]
Kala, Subramanian [1 ]
机构
[1] Yashoda Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[2] Bharathiar Univ, Res & Dev Ctr, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiotherapy, New Delhi, India
关键词
Eclipse; head and neck; Monaco; volumetric modulated arc therapy; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PAROTID-GLAND FUNCTION; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SINUS CARCINOMA; PYRIFORM SINUS; IRRADIATION; IMRT; RISK;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.203600
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Purpose of this study is to dosimetrically compare head and neck (H and N) cancer patients planned with multivendor volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technology. VMAT treatment planning can be done using biological (treatment planning system [TPSB]: Monaco) or physical (TPSP : Eclipse)-based cost function optimization techniques. Planning and dosimetric comparisons were done in both techniques for H and N cases. Materials and Methods: Twenty H and N patients were retrospectively selected for this study. VMAT plans were generated using TPSP (V11.0) and TPSB (V3.0) TPS. A total dose of 66 Gy (planning target volume 1 [PTV1]) and 60 Gy (PTV2) were prescribed to primary and nodal target volumes. Clinical planning objectives were achieved by both the optimization techniques. Dosimetric parameters were calculated for PTVs, and quantitative analyses were performed for critical organs. Monitor units were compared between two TPSs, and gamma analysis was performed between I'matriXX measured and TPS calculated. Results: Clinically, acceptable VMAT plans showed comparable dose distributions between TPSB and TPSP optimization techniques. Comparison of mean dose, homogeneity index, and conformity index for PTV1 showed no statistical difference (P-0.922, 0.096, and 0.097); however, in PTV2 statistically significant difference was observed (P-0.024, 0.008, and 0.002) between TPSB and TPSP. TPSB optimization showed statistically significant superiority for spinal cord and brainstem (D-1% P-0.0078, 0.00002) whereas improved parotid sparing was observed in TPSP optimization (mean dose P-0.00205). Gamma analysis illustrated that both systems could produce clinically deliverable plans. Conclusion: VMAT plans by TPSP and TPSB offered clinically acceptable dose distributions. TPSB-based optimization showed enhanced sparing of serial organs whereas TPSP -based optimization showed superior sparing of parallel organs.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy [J].
Bedford, James L. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5128-5138
[2]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces xerostomia compared with conventional radiotherapy [J].
Braam, Petra M. ;
Terhaard, Chris H. J. ;
Roesink, Judith M. ;
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04) :975-980
[3]   Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy [J].
Braam, PM ;
Roesink, JM ;
Moerland, MA ;
Raaijmakers, CPJ ;
Schipper, M ;
Terhaard, CHJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (03) :659-664
[4]   Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Brizel, DM ;
Albers, ME ;
Fisher, SR ;
Scher, RL ;
Richtsmeier, WJ ;
Hars, V ;
George, SL ;
Huang, AT ;
Prosnitz, LR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (25) :1798-1804
[5]   Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning [J].
Bzdusek, Karl ;
Friberger, Henrik ;
Eriksson, Kjell ;
Hardemark, Bjorn ;
Robinson, David ;
Kaus, Michael .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2328-2339
[6]  
Carlo MP, 1997, 20 INT C US COMP RAD
[7]   A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: Initial results [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Deasy, JO ;
Markman, J ;
Haynie, J ;
Perez, CA ;
Purdy, JA ;
Low, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04) :907-916
[8]   LARGE COHORT DOSE-VOLUME RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PAROTID GLAND FUNCTION AFTER RADIOTHERAPY: INTENSITY-MODULATED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY [J].
Dijkema, Tim ;
Terhaard, Chris H. J. ;
Roesink, Judith M. ;
Braam, Petra M. ;
van Gils, Carla H. ;
Moerland, Marinus A. ;
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04) :1101-1109
[9]   Is a single arc sufficient in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for complex-shaped target volumes? [J].
Guckenberger, Matthias ;
Richter, Anne ;
Krieger, Thomas ;
Wilbert, Juergen ;
Baier, Kurt ;
Flentje, Michael .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 93 (02) :259-265
[10]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers [J].
Hall, Eric J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (01) :1-7