The impact of recommendations and warnings on the quality evaluation of health websites: An online experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Diviani, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
Meppelink, Corine S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Parapleg Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Online information; Information evaluation; Evaluation criteria; Warnings; Health literacy; WORLD-WIDE-WEB; INFORMATION; LITERACY; INTERNET; CREDIBILITY; READABILITY; CONSUMERS; CRITERIA; RECALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.057
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With the increase in availability of online health information (OHI), consumers need to be able to properly evaluate the quality of health websites. Although several established evaluation criteria for OHI are available, these are rarely used by consumers. To improve people's ability and motivation to critically evaluate OHI, insights into how these criteria can optimally be communicated are needed. This study aims to investigate whether educational messages recommending the use of quality criteria can improve consumers' ability to evaluate OHI credibility, especially among people with low health literacy. We also test whether these messages can yield a stronger effect when combined with information warning consumers against using non-established criteria. In an online experiment, we randomly assigned 403 participants to one of four conditions and asked them to evaluate two websites of different quality. The conditions consisted of recommendations promoting the use of established evaluation criteria, warnings against using commonly adopted non-established criteria, a combination of the two, and a control group. Participants exposed to messages recommending established criteria evaluated the credibility of the lower quality website as poorer, and were better able to discriminate between high and low quality information compared to those in the control group. A combination of recommendations and warnings also improved people's ability to evaluate, but did not yield a stronger effect than the recommendations alone. Subgroup analysis, however, showed that these effects existed only for those with high health literacy. We conclude that providing consumers with criteria to evaluate OHI might be a viable way to improve people's evaluation skills of online health materials. Further research is needed to identify efficient ways to communicate these criteria to low health literate audiences. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy
    Byrne, Jim
    Keogh, Samuel
    Cullinane, Carolyn
    Razzaq, Zeeshan
    Redmond, Henry Paul
    OTO OPEN, 2022, 6 (04)
  • [32] Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers
    Choudhery, Sadia
    Xi, Yin
    Chen, Heng
    Aboul-Fettouh, Nader
    Goldenmerry, YPaul
    Ho, Charles
    Viroslav, Hannah
    Zhang, Chelsea
    Goudreau, Sally
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (10) : 1245 - 1251
  • [33] Concussion information online: evaluation of information quality, content and readability of concussion-related websites
    Ahmed, Osman H.
    Sullivan, S. John
    Schneiders, Anthony G.
    McCrory, Paul R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 46 (09) : 675 - 683
  • [34] Towards a Contents Quality Assessment Model of Health Units Websites
    Leite, Patricia
    Goncalves, Joaquim
    Teixeira, Paulo
    Rocha, Alvaro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 9TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI 2014), 2014,
  • [35] EVALUATION OF ONLINE COURSE WEBSITES: IS TEACHING ONLINE A TUG-OF-WAR?
    Hathorn, Lesley
    Hathorn, John
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2010, 42 (02) : 197 - 217
  • [36] Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Jamal, M. Shazil
    Hurley, E. T.
    Davey, M. S.
    Asad, H.
    Gaafar, M.
    Mullett, H.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2023, 105 (05) : 394 - 399
  • [37] Improving Access to Online Health Information With Conversational Agents: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
    Bickmore, Timothy W.
    Utami, Dina
    Matsuyama, Robin
    Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (01)
  • [38] A Multimetric Evaluation of Online Spanish Health Resources for Lymphedema
    Johnson, Anna Rose
    Doval, Andres F.
    Egeler, Sabine A.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Singhal, Dhruv
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [39] Acute low back pain information online: An evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites
    Hendrick, Paul A.
    Ahmed, Osman H.
    Bankier, Shane S.
    Chan, Tze Jieh
    Crawford, Sarah A.
    Ryder, Catherine R.
    Welsh, Lisa J.
    Schneiders, Anthony G.
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2012, 17 (04) : 318 - 324
  • [40] Comparing the Quality of Latin American e-Health National Websites
    Esteves, Jose
    Bohorquez Lopez, Victor W.
    AMCIS 2010 PROCEEDINGS, 2010,