Assessing and mitigating vulnerability and fire risk in historic centres: A cost-benefit analysis

被引:28
作者
Tozo Neto, Julio [1 ]
Ferreira, Tiago Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Fundacao Assis Gurgacz, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Cascavel, BR-85806095 Cascavel, Brazil
[2] Univ Minho, Inst Sci & Innovat Biosustainabil IB S, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Fire risk; Built heritage; Fire Risk Index method; Cost-benefit analysis; CULTURAL-HERITAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.003
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Assessing and mitigating fire risk and vulnerability is of paramount importance, especially in historical centres, where the characteristics of the buildings and these areas themselves significantly contribute to the ignition and propagation of fire. Federal regulations require buildings to follow guidelines aimed at reducing fire risk, which may require undesirable changes to the architectural and historical characteristics of old constructions. In order to solve this conflict, some methodologies explicitly designed for the assessment of fire risk in ancient buildings, namely the ARICA and the FRI method, have been developed in recent years. A study recently conducted at the Historic Centre of Guimaraes, in Portugal, in which the condition of 269 buildings was assessed, revealed that a high percentage of these buildings present a moderate to high fire risk. Based on this previous study, the present work discusses the improvement in the fire safety of the Historic Centre of Guimaraes through the application of a series of risk mitigation strategies, which are analyzed resorting to a GIS tool. Analysis revealed that the application such intervention strategies, with an average cost of 28.48 euros per square metre, led to a reduction of the number of buildings considered to be of moderate to high fire risk from 67% to 1%, and to an increase of the percentage of buildings complying with regulations from 6% to 58%. (c) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-benefit analysis of electrocyclone and cyclone
    Chen, CJ
    Wang, LFS
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2001, 31 (04) : 285 - 292
  • [32] Economics of Sex: Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Petr Houdek
    Petr Koblovský
    Society, 2017, 54 : 18 - 22
  • [33] Voluntariness and the bounds of cost-benefit analysis
    Sugden, Robert
    BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 7 (04) : 954 - 962
  • [34] Decision trees in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management plans
    Napolitano, Jacopo
    Di Francesco, Massimo
    Sechi, Giovanni Maria
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2024, 26 (04) : 762 - 778
  • [35] Cost-Benefit Analysis for Optimization of Risk Protection Under Budget Constraints
    Spackova, Olga
    Straub, Daniel
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (05) : 941 - 959
  • [36] Implementation of quantitative risk and cost-benefit analysis in an aging offshore facility
    Lazuardi, Khoir
    Kumaraningrum, Anggraini Ratih
    Hermansyah, Heri
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (S1) : S116 - S127
  • [37] Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of disaster risk management in a development context
    Kull, Daniel
    Mechler, Reinhard
    Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan
    DISASTERS, 2013, 37 (03) : 374 - 400
  • [38] A cost-benefit analysis of testing for influenza A in high-risk adults
    Hueston, WJ
    Benich, JJ
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [39] Cost-benefit analysis in fire safety engineering: State-of-the-art and reference methodology
    Van Coile, Ruben
    Lucherini, Andrea
    Chaudhary, Ranjit Kumar
    Ni, Shuna
    Unobe, David
    Gernay, Thomas
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2023, 168
  • [40] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Protection in Buildings: Application of a Present Net Value Approach
    Gernay, Thomas
    Ni, Shuna
    Unobe, David
    Lucherini, Andrea
    Chaudhary, Ranjit
    Van Coile, Ruben
    FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 59 (04) : 2023 - 2053