Low-Complexity Implementation of Convex Optimization-Based Phase Retrieval

被引:5
作者
Arik, Sercan O. [1 ]
Kahn, Joseph M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baidu Silicon Valley Artificial Intelligence Lab, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, EL Ginzton Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Alternative direction method of multipliers; convex optimization; mode-division multiplexing; optical communications; phase retrieval; SIGNAL RECOVERY; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/JLT.2018.2811755
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Phase retrieval has important applications in optical imaging, communications, and sensing. Lifting the dimensionality of the problem allows phase retrieval to be approximated as a convex optimization problem in a higher dimensional space. Convex optimization-based phase retrieval has been shown to yield high accuracy, yet its low-complexity implementation has not been explored. In this paper, we study three fundamental approaches for its low-complexity implementation: the projected gradient method, the Nesterov accelerated gradient method, and the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). We derive the corresponding estimation algorithms and evaluate their complexities. We compare their performance in the application area of direct-detection mode-division multiplexing. We demonstrate that they yield small estimation penalties (less than 0.2 dB for transmitter processing and less than 0.6 dB for receiver equalization) while yielding low computational cost, as their implementation complexities all scale quadratically in the number of unknown parameters. Among the three methods, ADMM achieves convergence after the fewest iterations and the fewest computational operations.
引用
收藏
页码:2358 / 2365
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Fast autofocusing strategy for phase retrieval based on statistical gradient optimization [J].
Cao, Wen ;
Bai, Ling ;
Xu, Yueshu ;
Kuang, Cuifang ;
Liu, Xu .
OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2025, 184
[42]   Low-Complexity Blind Carrier Phase Recovery for C-mQAM Coherent Systems [J].
Zhang, Ping ;
Ren, Hongliang ;
Gao, Mingyi ;
Lu, Jin ;
Le, Zichun ;
Qin, Yali ;
Hu, Weisheng .
IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL, 2019, 11 (01)
[43]   Using convex optimization of autocorrelation with constrained support and windowing for improved phase retrieval accuracy [J].
Pietrini, Alberto ;
Nettelblad, Carl .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2018, 26 (19) :24422-24443
[44]   Low-Complexity Reliability-Based Equalization and Detection for OTFS-NOMA [J].
McWade, Stephen ;
Farhang, Arman ;
Flanagan, Mark F. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 71 (11) :6779-6792
[45]   Low-complexity PDE-based approach for automatic microarray image processing [J].
Belean, Bogdan ;
Terebes, Romulus ;
Bot, Adrian .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2015, 53 (02) :99-110
[46]   Low-complexity 8-point DCT approximations based on integer functions [J].
Cintra, R. J. ;
Bayer, F. M. ;
Tablada, C. J. .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 99 :201-214
[47]   Low-Complexity Image and Video Coding Based on an Approximate Discrete Tchebichef Transform [J].
Oliveira, Paulo A. M. ;
Cintra, Renato J. ;
Bayer, Fabio M. ;
Kulasekera, Sunera ;
Madanayake, Arjuna .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) :1066-1076
[48]   Low-Complexity Slot-Based Bit Loading for Multicarrier Wireless Systems [J].
Iraqi, Y. ;
Al-Dweik, A. ;
Kalil, M. .
2018 IEEE 87TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2018,
[49]   Low-Complexity Fast CU Classification Decision Method Based on LGBM Classifier [J].
Wang, Yanjun ;
Liu, Yong ;
Zhao, Jinchao ;
Zhang, Qiuwen .
ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (11)
[50]   A low-complexity algorithm based on variational Bayesian inference for MIMO channel estimation [J].
Tong, Wentao ;
Ge, Wei ;
Han, Xiao ;
Yin, Jingwei .
APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2023, 211