French validation of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory

被引:12
作者
Moussaoui, L. S. [1 ]
Desrichard, O. [1 ]
Mella, N. [1 ]
Blum, A. [1 ]
Cantarella, M. [1 ]
Clemence, A. [2 ]
Battiaz, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Sci Educ, 40 Blvd Pont DArve, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Fac Sci Sociales & Polit, Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE | 2016年 / 66卷 / 06期
关键词
Environmental attitudes measure; Scale; Inventory; French validation; VALUES; PERSPECTIVE; DETERMINANTS; PARADIGM; BEHAVIOR; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.erap.2016.06.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction. Climate change has made it necessary to develop valid tools for studying pro environmental behaviors. Objectives. The present study assessed the validity of the French translation of the brief version of Milfont and Duckitt's (2010) Environmental Attitudes Inventory. We chose this scale for its psychometric properties, its ability to predict behaviors, its theoretical foundations, and its use in many countries. In addition to the translation, we tested a shortened, 12-item version of the scale. Method. Three samples were used to study the structure of the IAE, its nomological network, its test retest fidelity, and its predictive validity. Results. IAE-24 has similar psychometric properties to the original version, for both one-factor and two factor models (preservation and utilization dimensions). IAE-12 has satisfactory internal consistency if the one-factor model is used. The nomological network of IAE-24 is not totally identical to the original version. Differences can be ascribed to inconsistencies in the literature and the use of different scales. Both IAE-24 and IAE-12 have very satisfactory predictive validity and test retest reliability. Conclusion. The French version of the IAE has satisfactory psychometric properties. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Ajdukovic I, 2015, PROENVIRONMENTAL NOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UN C ENV DEV AG 21
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANAL DONNEES APPROCH
[4]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[5]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[6]   What are the reasons for being pro-environmental? Adopting a socio-normative perspective on the relationship between values and "pro-environmentalism" [J].
Becker, M. ;
Felonneau, M-L .
PRATIQUES PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2011, 17 (03) :237-250
[7]   Consideration of Future Consequences as a Predictor of Environmentally Responsible Behavior: Evidence From a General Population Study [J].
Bruderer Enzler, Heidi .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 47 (06) :618-643
[8]  
Corral-Verdugo V., 2000, J ENVIRON EDUC, V31, P25, DOI [10.1080/00958960009598642, DOI 10.1080/00958960009598642]
[9]  
Demarque C, 2010, B PSYCHOL, V65, P351
[10]  
Desrichard O, 2015, ICE DEV INVENT UNPUB