A Systematic Review of the Use of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale and the Support Team Assessment Schedule in Palliative Care

被引:86
作者
Collins, Emily S. [1 ,2 ]
Witt, Jana [1 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [3 ]
Daveson, Barbara A. [1 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [1 ]
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Cicely Saunders Inst, London SE5 9PJ, England
[2] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[3] Klinikum Univ Munchen, Klin & Poliklin Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Outcome measure (health care); palliative care; patient outcome assessment; hospice care; terminal care; OF-LIFE CARE; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; LOW-INCOME COUNTRY; IMPROVE PAIN; HIV PATIENTS; LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY; END; LONG; HOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.015
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. The Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) and the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) are two outcome measures used in palliative care settings to assess palliative concerns, needs, and quality of care. Objectives. This systematic review builds on the findings of a previous review to appraise the use of the POS and STAS since 2010, particularly the context and nature of their use. Methods. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index, and CINAHL were searched for studies published between February 2010 and June 2014. Relevant authors were contacted, and reference lists of included studies were searched. Studies reporting validation or the use of the POS or STAS were included, and data on sample population, how the outcome measure was being used, study design, study aim, and results of the study were extracted. Results. Forty-three studies were included (POS n = 35, STAS n = 8). There was an increase in the use of the POS and STAS in Europe and Africa with the publication of 13 new translations of the POS. Most studies focused on the use, rather than further validation, of the POS and STAS. There has been increasing use of these measures within nonecancer patient groups. Conclusion. The POS and STAS are now used in a wide variety of settings and countries. These tools may be used in the future to compare palliative care needs and quality of care across diverse contexts and patient groups. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / +
页数:31
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Symptom Burden and Associated Factors in Renal Transplant Patients in the U.K [J].
Afshar, Maryam ;
Rebollo-Mesa, Irene ;
Murphy, Emma ;
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. ;
Mamode, Nizam .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 44 (02) :229-238
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH QUAL LIFE OUTCO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OUTCOME MEASUREMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUR J PALLIAT CARE
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], CLIN AUDIT PALLIATIV
[7]   Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers [J].
Antunes, Barbara ;
Harding, Richard ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) :158-175
[8]   The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: A systematic review of POS and STAS [J].
Bausewein, C. ;
Le Grice, C. ;
Simon, S. T. ;
Higginson, I. J. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (04) :304-313
[9]   Individual breathlessness trajectories do not match summary trajectories in advanced cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a longitudinal study [J].
Bausewein, Claudia ;
Booth, Sara ;
Gysels, Marjolein ;
Kuehnbach, Robert ;
Haberland, Birgit ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (08) :777-786
[10]   Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare [J].
Black, Nick .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346