High-rate hydrogenotrophic denitrification in a pressurized reactor

被引:23
作者
Epsztein, Razi [1 ]
Beliavski, Michael [1 ]
Tarre, Sheldon [1 ]
Green, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Nitrate removal; Drinking water; Hydrogenotrophic denitrification; Pressurized reactor; Hydrogen pressure; Nitrogen accumulation; MEMBRANE-BIOFILM REACTOR; DRINKING-WATER; DEPENDENT DENITRIFICATION; BIOLOGICAL DENITRIFICATION; NITRATE REMOVAL; PH; BIOREACTOR; KINETICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2015.11.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most conventional hydrogenotrophic denitrification reactors based on packed- or fluidized-bed present a similar H-2 delivery scheme of continuous gas purging to the atmosphere in order to improve H-2 transfer rates and enable discharge of N-2 gas produced during denitrification. This operation results in a significant release of H-2 gas to atmosphere with its related economic and safety concerns. The current research proposes a novel pressurized high-rate hydrogenotrophic reactor for denitrification without gas purging. The investigation performed refutes a prevalent notion that N-2 gas accumulates in the headspace of a closed reactor during denitrification. Instead, this research shows that during continuous operation a gas-liquid equilibrium is established in the reactor according to Henry's law and excess N-2 gas is carried out by the effluent in dissolved form. Therefore, no gas purging is required and H-2 loss is limited only to the dissolved H-2 in the effluent. As a consequence, a simple low-cost and high-rate reactor with closed headspace can be designed for denitrification. The proposed reactor is operated as a trickling filter where water is recirculated over biofilm carriers with high surface area. The feasibility of the proposed reactor was shown for two effluent concentrations of 10 and 1 mg NO3--N/L. Average denitrification rates of 2.1 +/- 0.2 and 1.06 +/- 0.06 g NO3--N/(L-reactor d) with H2 utilization efficiencies of 92.8% and 96.9% were measured for the two effluent concentrations, respectively. Higher denitrification rates of up to 5 g NO3--N/(L-reactor d) were observed at higher recirculation flow rates and higher partial pressures of H-2. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 584
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Hydrogenotrophic denitrification with immobilized Alcaligenes eutrophus for drinking water treatment [J].
Chang, CC ;
Tseng, SK ;
Huang, HK .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 69 (01) :53-58
[2]  
Cliford D., 1993, RES TECHNOL, P135
[3]   Trickling Filter and Trickling Filter-Suspended Growth Process Design and Operation: A State-of-the-Art Review [J].
Daigger, Glen T. ;
Boltz, Joshua P. .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2011, 83 (05) :388-404
[4]   Hydrogenotrophic denitrification of drinking water using a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor [J].
Ergas, SJ ;
Reuss, AF .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2001, 50 (03) :161-171
[5]   A bio-electrochemical reactor coupled with adsorber for the removal of nitrate and inhibitory pesticide [J].
Feleke, Z ;
Sakakibara, Y .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (12) :3092-3102
[6]   Denitrification kinetics of high nitrate concentration water: pH effect on inhibition and nitrite accumulation [J].
Glass, C ;
Silverstein, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (03) :831-839
[7]  
Green M., [High rate hydrogenotrophic reactor for denitrification of groundwater, IL Patent Application], Patent No. 240631
[8]   Removal of nitrate in aquaria by means of electrochemically generated hydrogen gas as electron donor for biological denitrification [J].
Grommen, R ;
Verhaege, M ;
Verstraete, W .
AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 34 (01) :33-39
[9]   Achieving biofilm control in a membrane biofilm reactor removing total nitrogen [J].
Hwang, Jong Hyuk ;
Cicek, Nazim ;
Oleszkiewicz, Jan A. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (07) :2283-2291
[10]   Hydrogenotrophic denitrification of potable water: A review [J].
Karanasios, K. A. ;
Vasiliadou, I. A. ;
Pavlou, S. ;
Vayenas, D. V. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 180 (1-3) :20-37