DOSIMETRIC CHANGES RESULTING FROM PATIENT ROTATIONAL SETUP ERRORS IN PROTON THERAPY PROSTATE PLANS

被引:20
作者
Sejpal, Samir V. [1 ]
Amos, Richard A. [1 ]
Bluett, Jaques B. [1 ]
Levy, Lawrence B. [1 ]
Kudchadker, Rajat J. [1 ]
Johnson, Jennifer [1 ]
Choi, Seungtaek [1 ]
Lee, Andrew K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2009年 / 75卷 / 01期
关键词
Proton therapy; Prostate cancer; Rotational setup errors; Dosimetry; Treatment planning; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; MOTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.042
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the dose changes to the target and critical structures from rotational setup errors in prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy. Methods and Materials: A total of 70 plans were analyzed for 10 patients treated with parallel-opposed proton beams to a dose of 7,600 Co-60-cGy-equivalent (CcGE) in 200 CcGE fractions to the clinical target volume (i.e., prostate and proximal seminal vesicles). Rotational setup errors of +3 degrees, -3 degrees, +5 degrees, and -5 degrees (to simulate pelvic tilt) were generated by adjusting the gantry. Horizontal couch shifts of +3 degrees and -3 degrees (to simulate longitudinal setup variability) were also generated. Verification plans were recomputed, keeping the same treatment parameters as the control. Results: All changes shown are for 38 fractions. The mean clinical target volume dose was 7,780 CcGE. The mean change in the clinical target volume dose in the worse case scenario for all shifts was 2 CcGE (absolute range in worst case scenario, 7,729-7,848 CcGE). The mean changes in the critical organ dose in the worst case scenario was 6 CcGE (bladder), 18 CcGE (rectum), 36 CcGE (anterior rectal wall), and 141 CcGE (femoral heads) for all plans. In general, the percentage of change in the worse case scenario for all shifts to the critical structures was <5%. Deviations in the absolute percentage of volume of organ receiving 45 and 70 Gy for the bladder and rectum were <2% for all plans. Conclusion: Patient rotational movements of 3 degrees and 5 degrees and horizontal couch shifts of 3 degrees in prostate proton planning did not confer clinically significant dose changes to the target volumes or critical structures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 48
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer
    Byrne, TE
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [2] Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments
    Fu, Weihua
    Yang, Yong
    Li, Xiang
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Yue, Ning J.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (20) : 5321 - 5331
  • [3] Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: Analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers
    Kotte, Alexis N. T. J.
    Hofman, Pieter
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02): : 419 - 425
  • [4] Range, range modulation, and field radius requirements for proton therapy of prostate cancer
    Moyers, MF
    Miller, DW
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (05) : 445 - 447
  • [5] Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors
    Moyers, MF
    Miller, DW
    Bush, DA
    Slater, JD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05): : 1429 - 1438
  • [6] Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI
    Padhani, AR
    Khoo, VS
    Suckling, J
    Husband, JE
    Leach, MO
    Dearnaley, DP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (03): : 525 - 533
  • [7] Patient tolerance of rectal balloons in conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer
    Ronson, BB
    Yonemoto, LT
    Rossi, CJ
    Slater, JM
    Slater, JD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (05): : 1367 - 1370
  • [8] ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - THE RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF HIGH-DOSE IRRADIATION BOOSTING WITH CONFORMAL PROTONS COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL-DOSE IRRADIATION USING PHOTONS ALONE
    SHIPLEY, WU
    VERHEY, LJ
    MUNZENRIDER, JE
    SUIT, HD
    URIE, MM
    MCMANUS, PL
    YOUNG, RH
    SHIPLEY, JW
    ZIETMAN, AL
    BIGGS, PJ
    HENEY, NM
    GOITEIN, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [9] Proton therapy for prostate cancer: The initial Loma Linda University experience
    Slater, JD
    Rossi, CJ
    Yonemoto, LT
    Bush, DA
    Jabola, BR
    Levy, RP
    Grove, RI
    Preston, W
    Slater, JM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02): : 348 - 352
  • [10] COMPENSATING FOR HETEROGENEITIES IN PROTON RADIATION-THERAPY
    URIE, M
    GOITEIN, M
    WAGNER, M
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (05) : 553 - 566