Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation

被引:2
作者
Sean, Monica [1 ]
Coulombe-Leveque, Alexia [1 ]
Bordeleau, Martine [1 ]
Vincenot, Matthieu [1 ]
Gendron, Louis [2 ]
Marchand, Serge [3 ]
Leonard, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Res Ctr Aging, Sch Rehabil, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Pharmacol Physiol, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH | 2021年 / 2卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
pain; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; thermode; cold pressor test; conditioned pain modulation; temporal summation of pain; dynamic quantitative sensory testing; 2ND PAIN; FIBROMYALGIA; STIMULATION; SENSITIZATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3389/fpain.2021.659563
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) can be measured using a thermode and a cold pressor test (CPT). Unfortunately, these tools are complex, expensive, and are ill-suited for routine clinical assessments. Building on the results from an exploratory study that attempted to use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to measure CPM and TSP, the present study assesses whether a "new" TENS protocol can be used instead of the thermode and CPT to measure CPM and TSP. The objective of this study was to compare the thermode/CPT protocol with the new TENS protocol, by (1) measuring the association between the TSP evoked by the two protocols; (2) measuring the association between the CPM evoked by the two protocols; and by (3) assessing whether the two protocols successfully trigger TSP and CPM in a similar number of participants. We assessed TSP and CPM in 50 healthy participants, using our new TENS protocol and a thermode/CPT protocol (repeated measures and randomized order). In the TENS protocol, both the test stimulus (TS) and the conditioning stimulus (CS) were delivered using TENS; in the thermode/CPT protocol, the TS was delivered using a thermode and the CS consisted of a CPT. There was no association between the response evoked by the two protocols, neither for TSP nor for CPM. The number of participants showing TSP [49 with TENS and 29 with thermode (p < 0.001)] and CPM [16 with TENS and 30 with thermode (p = 0.01)] was different in both protocols. Our results suggest that response to one modality does not predict response to the other; as such, TENS cannot be used instead of a thermode/CPT protocol to assess TSP and CPM without significantly affecting the results. Moreover, while at first glance it appears that TENS is more effective than the thermode/CPT protocol to induce TSP, but less so to induce CPM, these results should be interpreted carefully. Indeed, TSP and CPM response appear to be modality-dependent as opposed to an absolute phenomenon, and the two protocols may tap into entirely different mechanisms, especially in the case of TSP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pressure Pain Thresholds and Conditioned Pain Modulation in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Women With Fibromyalgia
    Berardi, Giovanni
    Dailey, Dana L.
    Chimenti, Ruth
    Merriwether, Ericka
    Vance, Carol G. T.
    Rakel, Barbara A.
    Crofford, Leslie J.
    Sluka, Kathleen A.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 25 (06)
  • [22] Conditioning pain modulation reduces pain only during the first stimulation of the temporal summation of pain paradigm in healthy participants
    Holden, Sinead
    Petersen, Kristian Kjaer
    Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
    Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 23 (07) : 1390 - 1396
  • [23] Age and gender differences in mechanically induced intraoral temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation in healthy subjects
    Khan, Junad
    Korczeniewska, Olga
    Benoliel, Rafael
    Kalladka, Mythili
    Eliav, Eli
    Nasri-Heir, Cibelle
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 126 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [24] Assessment of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants and patients with chronic pain: manifestations and implications for pain progression
    Petersen, Kristian K.
    McPhee, Megan E.
    Hoegh, Morten S.
    Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
    CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 13 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [25] Pain facilitation and pain inhibition during conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia and in healthy controls
    Potvin, Stephane
    Marchand, Serge
    PAIN, 2016, 157 (08) : 1704 - 1710
  • [26] Conditioned Pain Modulation in Patients With Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
    Mlekusch, Sabine
    Neziri, Alban Y.
    Limacher, Andreas
    Jueni, Peter
    Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
    Curatolo, Michele
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [27] The relationship between sensitivity to pain and conditioned pain modulation in healthy people
    Grouper, Hadas
    Eisenberg, Elon
    Pud, Droit
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 708
  • [28] Slowly Repeated Evoked Pain as a Marker of Central Sensitization in Fibromyalgia: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability in Comparison With Temporal Summation of Pain
    de la Coba, Pablo
    Bruehl, Stephen
    Maria Galvez-Sanchez, Carmen
    Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A.
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06): : 573 - 580
  • [29] An Overview of Offset Analgesia and the Comparison with Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Systematic Literature Review
    Hermans, Linda
    Calders, Patrick
    Van Oosterwijck, Jessica
    Verschelde, Ellen
    Bertel, Eva
    Meeus, Mira
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2016, 19 (06) : 307 - 326
  • [30] Conditioned Pain Modulation in Sexual Assault Survivors
    Hellman, Natalie
    Sturycz, Cassandra A.
    Lannon, Edward W.
    Kuhn, Bethany L.
    Guereca, Yvette M.
    Toledo, Tyler A.
    Payne, Michael F.
    Huber, Felicitas A.
    Demuth, Mara
    Palit, Shreela
    Shadlow, Joanna O.
    Rhudy, Jamie L.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 20 (09) : 1027 - 1039