Evaluation of the revised Faces Pain Scale, Verbal Descriptor Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Iowa Pain Thermometer in older minority adults

被引:122
作者
Ware, Laurie Jowers
Epps, Cynthia D.
Herr, Keela
Packard, Abbot
机构
[1] Univ W Georgia, Dept Nursing, Carrollton, GA 30118 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ W Georgia, Carrollton, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2006.06.005
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of selected pain intensity scales including the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Iowa Pain Thermometer (IPT) with a cognitively impaired minority sample. A descriptive correlational design was used, and a convenience sample of 68 participants, admitted to acute care facilities in the South, with an average Mini Mental Status Exam score of 23 comprised the sample. Thirty-two percent of the participants were males, and 68% were females. The majority (74%) of the sample consisted of African-American participants with the exception that 16% were Hispanic and 10% were Asian. An overwhelming majority of participants were able to use all of the tools. Concurrent validity was supported with correlations ranging from 0.56 to 0.90. The lowest correlations were found between the FPS-R and the other scales, suggesting that the FPS-R may be measuring a broader construct incorporating pain. Test-retest reliability was supported with coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.89. In terms of pain scale preference, the Numeric Rating Scale (33%) was the preferred scale in the cognitively intact group and the FPS-R (54%) was the preferred scale in the cognitively impaired group. When race and cognitive status were considered, African-Americans and Hispanics preferred the FPS-R. Severely, moderately, and mildly impaired participants also preferred the FPS-R. The findings of this study support the use of these scales with older cognitively impaired minority adults. (c) 2006 by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 125
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] *AG HEALTH POL RES, 2004, NAT HEALTH DISP REP
  • [2] *AG HEALTH POL RES, 1994, AHCPR PUBL
  • [3] *AG HEALTH POL RES, 1992, AHCPR PUBL
  • [4] *AM GER SOC, 2002, J AM GERIATR SOC, V50, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], HLTH PEOPL 2010 NAT
  • [6] Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer
    Bernabei, R
    Gambassi, G
    Lapane, K
    Landi, F
    Gatsonis, C
    Dunlop, R
    Lipsitz, L
    Steel, K
    Mor, V
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (23): : 1877 - 1882
  • [7] THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES
    BIERI, D
    REEVE, RA
    CHAMPION, GD
    ADDICOAT, L
    ZIEGLER, JB
    [J]. PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [8] Race, ethnicity, and pain treatment: Striving to understand the causes and solutions to the disparities in pain treatment
    Bonham, VL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2001, 29 (01) : 52 - +
  • [9] Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales
    Chibnall, JT
    Tait, RC
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 92 (1-2) : 173 - 186
  • [10] Pain assessment practices with nursing home residents
    Clark, L
    Jones, K
    Pennington, K
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2004, 26 (07) : 733 - 750