Quality evaluation of patient educational resources for catheter ablation treatment of atrial fibrillation

被引:8
作者
Cano Valls, Alba [1 ]
Gallagher, Celine [2 ,3 ]
Carro, Esther [1 ]
Matas, Mariona [1 ]
Mont, Lluis [1 ]
Lau, Dennis [2 ,3 ]
Sanders, Prashanthan [2 ,3 ]
Hendriks, Jeroen M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Cardiovasc Clin, Unitat Arritmies, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Heart Rhythm Disorders, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Caring Futures Inst, GPO Box 2100,Sturt Rd,Bedford Pk, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Web-based information; Internet; Patient educational resources; PEMAT; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; WRITTEN DRUG INFORMATION; STROKE PREVENTION; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1093/eurjcn/zvab078
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing rapidly with the growing utilization of catheter ablation (CA) as a treatment strategy. Education for individuals undertaking this procedure is diverse, with varying degrees of information provided and little standardization. Many individuals utilize the internet as an educational resource. However, there is limited regulation of online patient information. To evaluate the quality of web-based patient education resources for patients undergoing CA for AF. Methods and results A cross-sectional observational study was performed to obtain all freely accessible online educational resources about CA for AF from inception until 1 October 2019. Search engines used: Google, Yahoo!, and Bing. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) was used to evaluate the quality of web-based patient education materials and printable tools. The PEMAT score objectively measures both the understandability and actionability of educational material. A total of 17 websites and 15 printable sources were included in the analysis. Non-government organizations developed 19% of materials and 75% were created by private or university hospitals. Nineteen sources (59.4%) were rated as highly understandable: 9 websites (52.9%) and 10 printable tools (66.7%). Seven sources (21.9%) were rated as highly actionable: 6 (35.3%) websites and 1 (6.7%) printable tool. Conclusion The overall understandability of educational CA material was high, whilst improvement of actionability is warranted. The addition of summaries, visual aids, and tools, such as checklists may improve quality. These findings have significant implications for the development of patient educational material for CA in AF.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 389
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Consumers Better Understand and Prefer Simplified Written Drug Information: An Evaluation of 2 Novel Formats Versus the Current CMI
    Aker, Julie
    Beck, Melissa
    Papay, Julie I.
    Cantu, Tom
    Ellis, Melissa
    Keravich, Dan
    Bibeau, Kristen
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2013, 47 (01) : 125 - 132
  • [2] Mobile health applications for atrial fibrillation: A readability and quality assessment
    Ayyaswami, Varun
    Padmanabhan, Divya L.
    Crihalmeanu, Tudor
    Thelmo, Franklin
    Prabhu, Arpan V.
    Magnani, Jared W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 293 : 288 - 293
  • [3] A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Nurse-Led Educational Intervention at the Time of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Quality of Life, Symptom Severity and Rehospitalisation
    Bowyer, John L.
    Tully, Phillip J.
    Ganesan, Anand N.
    Chahadi, Fahd K.
    Singleton, Cameron B.
    McGavigan, Andrew D.
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2017, 26 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [4] Shared decision-making in cardiology: Do patients want it and do doctors provide it?
    Burton, David
    Blundell, Nicholas
    Jones, Mari
    Fraser, Alan
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 80 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [5] Does YouTube provide high-quality resources for patient education on atrial fibrillation ablation?
    Camm, C. Fielder
    Russell, Emily
    Xu, Antonio Ji
    Rajappan, Kim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 272 : 189 - 193
  • [6] Chan S., 2021, J MED INTERNET RES, V19, P1
  • [7] Literacy and health outcomes - A systematic review of the literature
    DeWalt, DA
    Berkman, ND
    Sheridan, S
    Lohr, KN
    Pignone, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (12) : 1228 - 1239
  • [8] Partnering with patients in shared decision-making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Ferguson, Caleb
    Hendriks, Jeroen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2017, 16 (03) : 178 - 180
  • [9] National Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalization, Readmission, and Mortality for Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999-2013
    Freeman, James V.
    Wang, Yun
    Akar, Joseph
    Desai, Nihar
    Krumholz, Harlan
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (13) : 1227 - 1239
  • [10] Increasing trends in hospitalisations due to atrial fibrillation in Australia from 1993 to 2013
    Gallagher, Celine
    Hendriks, Jeroen M. L.
    Giles, Lynne
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Pham, Clarabelle
    Elliott, Adrian D.
    Middeldorp, Melissa E.
    Mahajan, Rajiv
    Lau, Dennis H.
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    Wong, Christopher X.
    [J]. HEART, 2019, 105 (17) : 1358 - 1363