Rationale for the Evaluation of Renal Functional Reserve in Living Kidney Donors and Recipients: A Pilot Study

被引:16
|
作者
Spinelli, Alessandra [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Aashish [1 ,5 ]
Villa, Gianluca [1 ,3 ]
Samoni, Sara [1 ,4 ]
Ramponi, Francesco [1 ]
Brocca, Alessandra [1 ]
Brendolan, Alessandra [1 ]
Chiaramonte, Stefano [1 ]
Castellano, Giuseppe [2 ]
Gesualdo, Loreto [2 ]
Ronco, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] San Bortolo Hosp, Int Renal Res Inst Vicenza, Dept Nephrol Dialysis & Transplantat, Vicenza, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Nephrol Dialysis & Transplantat Unit, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Sect Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Dept Hlth Sci, Florence, Italy
[4] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Life Sci, Pisa, Italy
[5] Fortis Escorts Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Renal Transplant Med, Amritsar, Punjab, India
关键词
Acute renal injury; Kidney transplantation; Acute protein load; Renal functional reserve; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SUBCLINICAL AKI; STRESS TEST; FOLLOW-UP; CAPACITY; RECOVERY; HEALTHY; NUMBER; TERM;
D O I
10.1159/000454931
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In living kidney transplantation, preoperative donors' renal functional reserve (RFR) may correlate with postoperative residual renal function in both donors and recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the donors' RFR before transplantation and to compare basal and stress renal function before and after transplantation in both donors and recipients. Methods: Seven pairs of living kidney donors and recipients were considered for this observational study. RFR was measured with a renal stress test (RST) before and after the kidney transplantation through an oral protein loading test (1 g/kg of body weight). RFR was defined as the difference between the maximum value of creatinine clearance after protein load (stress glomerular filtration rate, sGFR) and baseline creatinine clearance (basal GFR, bGFR). Results: Before transplantation, a significant difference between sGFR and bGFR (p = 0.04) was observed in donors, with an RFR = 30.6 (11.9-41.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2). After kidney transplantation, sGFR was similar to bGFR for both donors and recipients (p = 0.13), with a limited RFR (7.9 [6.70-19.25] and 14.90 [-6.67 to 25.53] mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively). The sum of the donor's and recipient's post-transplant sGFR was similar to the pre-transplant donor's sGFR (p = 0.73). Conclusion: RST is a safe, feasible, easy, and an inexpensive tool that is able to quantify RFR. In living kidney transplantation, it can be used in clinical practice to measure the original global filtration capacity of the donor's kidneys (sGFR) and to quantify the susceptibility of donors and recipients in developing postoperative kidney dysfunction. However, further studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up period are needed to test this hypothesis. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 276
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Kidney transplantation: The use of living donors with renal artery lesions
    Nahas, WC
    Lucon, AM
    Mazzucchi, E
    Scafuri, AG
    Neto, ED
    Ianhez, LE
    Arap, S
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04) : 1244 - 1247
  • [42] Protein and calorie restriction may improve outcomes in living kidney donors and kidney transplant recipients
    Jongbloed, Franny
    de Bruin, Ron W. F.
    Van Steeg, Harry
    Beekhof, Piet
    Wackers, Paul
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    Hoeijmakers, Jan H. J.
    Dolle, Martijn E. T.
    IJzermans, Jan N. M.
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (13): : 12441 - 12467
  • [43] Renal functional reserve in children with apparently normal congenital solitary functioning kidney
    Peco-Antic, Amira
    Paripovic, Dusan
    Kotur-Stevuljevic, Jelena
    Stefanovic, Aleksandra
    Scekic, Gordana
    Milosevski-Lomic, Gordana
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 45 (15) : 1173 - 1177
  • [44] Optimizing scintigraphic evaluation of split renal function in living kidney donors using the geometric mean method: a preliminary retrospective study
    Weinberger, Sarah
    Baeder, Michael
    Scheurig-Muenkler, Christian
    Steffen, Ingo Guenter
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Miller, Kurt
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 29 (03) : 435 - 441
  • [45] Optimizing scintigraphic evaluation of split renal function in living kidney donors using the geometric mean method: a preliminary retrospective study
    Sarah Weinberger
    Michael Baeder
    Christian Scheurig-Muenkler
    Ingo Guenter Steffen
    Ahmed Magheli
    Kurt Miller
    Carsten Kempkensteffen
    Journal of Nephrology, 2016, 29 : 435 - 441
  • [46] Long-term kidney function and survival in recipients of allografts from living kidney donors with hypertension: a national cohort study
    Al Ammary, Fawaz
    Yu, Sile
    Muzaale, Abimereki D.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Liyanage, Luckmini
    Crews, Deidra C.
    Brennan, Daniel C.
    El-Meanawy, Ashraf
    Alqahtani, Saleh
    Atta, Mohamed G.
    Levan, Macey L.
    Caffo, Brian S.
    Welling, Paul A.
    Massie, Allan B.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 (08) : 1530 - 1541
  • [47] Survival among renal allograft recipients from non related living donors
    Carolina Carmona, R.
    Pablo Huidobro, Juan E.
    Jorge Vega, S.
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2015, 143 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [48] The Socioeconomic Status of Donors and Recipients of Living Unrelated Renal Transplants in the United States
    Gore, John L.
    Singer, Jennifer S.
    Brown, Arleen F.
    Danovitch, Gabriel M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (05) : 1760 - 1765
  • [49] Psychosocial evaluation interview protocol for living related and living unrelated kidney donors
    Fisher, MS
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 38 (01) : 39 - 61
  • [50] Optimizing a kidney stress test to evaluate renal functional reserve
    Sharma, Aashish
    Zaragoza, Jose J.
    Villa, Gianluca
    Ribeiro, Leonardo C.
    Lu, Renhua
    Sartori, Marco
    Faggiana, Elena
    de Cal, Massimo
    Virzi, Grazia M.
    Corradi, Valentina
    Brocca, Alessandra
    Husain-Syed, Faeq
    Brendolan, Alessandra
    Ronco, Claudio
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 86 (01) : 18 - 26