Thermal Modeling Approaches for a LiCoO2 Lithium-ion Battery-A Comparative Study with Experimental Validation

被引:43
作者
Paccha-Herrera, Edwin [1 ]
Calderon-Munoz, Williams R. [1 ,2 ]
Orchard, Marcos [2 ,3 ]
Jaramillo, Francisco [3 ]
Medjaher, Kamal [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Fac Phys & Math Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Beauchef 851, Santiago 8370456, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Energy Ctr, Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370456, Chile
[3] Univ Chile, Fac Phys & Math Sci, Dept Elect Engn, Tupper 2007, Santiago 8370456, Chile
[4] Ecole Natl Ingenieurs Tarbes, LGP, 47 Ave Azereix, F-65016 Tarbes, France
来源
BATTERIES-BASEL | 2020年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
lithium-ion battery; MSMD; lumped model; ANSYS; natural convection; thermal management; MANAGEMENT; CELLS; TEMPERATURE; IMPEDANCE; PACK; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; RUNAWAY;
D O I
10.3390/batteries6030040
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Temperature prediction of a battery plays a significant role in terms of energy efficiency and safety of electric vehicles, as well as several kinds of electric and electronic devices. In this regard, it is crucial to identify an adequate model to study the thermal behavior of a battery. This article reports a comparative study on thermal modeling approaches by using a LiCoO2 26650 lithium-ion battery, and provides a methodology to characterize electrothermal phenomena. Three approaches have been implemented numerically-a thermal lumped model, a 3D computational fluid dynamics model, and an electrochemical model based on Newman, Tiedemann, Gu and Kim formulation. The last two methods were solved using ANSYS Fluent software. Simulations were validated with experimental measurements of the cell surface temperature at constant current discharge and under a highway driving cycle. Results show that the three models are consistent with actual temperature measurements. The electrochemical method has the lower error at 0.5C. Nevertheless, this model provides the higher error (1.3 degrees C) at 1.5C, where the maximum temperature increase of the cell was 18.1 degrees C. Under the driving cycle, all the models are in the same order of error. Lumped model is suitable to simulate a wide range of battery operating conditions. Furthermore, this work was expanded to study heat generation, voltage and heat transfer coefficient under natural convection.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Ahmadou Samba A., 2013, World Electr. Veh. J, V6, P629, DOI [10.3390/wevj6030629, DOI 10.3390/WEVJ6030629]
[2]   A lumped thermal model of lithium-ion battery cells considering radiative heat transfer [J].
Allafi, Walid ;
Zhang, Cheng ;
Uddin, Kotub ;
Worwood, Daniel ;
Truong Quang Dinh ;
Ormeno, Pedro Ascencio ;
Li, Kang ;
Marco, James .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 143 :472-481
[3]  
Ansys Inc., 2017, ANSYS FLUENT US GUID
[4]   A pseudo 3D electrochemical-thermal modeling and analysis of a lithium-ion battery for electric vehicle thermal management applications [J].
Bahiraei, Farid ;
Ghalkhani, Maryam ;
Fartaj, Amir ;
Nazri, Gholam-Abbas .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 125 :904-918
[5]   A Critical Review of Thermal Issues in Lithium-Ion Batteries [J].
Bandhauer, Todd M. ;
Garimella, Srinivas ;
Fuller, Thomas F. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 158 (03) :R1-R25
[6]  
Barai A, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI [10.1038/s41598-017-18424-5, 10.1038/s41598-018-35308-4, 10.1038/s41598-018-33185-5]
[7]   A study on the impact of lithium-ion cell relaxation on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [J].
Barai, Anup ;
Chouchelamane, Gael H. ;
Guo, Yue ;
McGordon, Andrew ;
Jennings, Paul .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2015, 280 :74-80
[8]  
Bergman T.L., 2017, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, V8th ed., P1046
[9]   A GENERAL ENERGY-BALANCE FOR BATTERY SYSTEMS [J].
BERNARDI, D ;
PAWLIKOWSKI, E ;
NEWMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 132 (01) :5-12
[10]   Methodology to determine the heat capacity of lithium-ion cells [J].
Bryden, Thomas S. ;
Dimitrov, Borislav ;
Hilton, George ;
de Leon, Carlos Ponce ;
Bugryniec, Peter ;
Brown, Solomon ;
Cumming, Denis ;
Cruden, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2018, 395 :369-378