The Influence of Different Fertilization Strategies on the Grain Yield of Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.) under Conventional and Conservation Tillage

被引:14
|
作者
Macak, Milan [1 ]
Candrakova, Eva [1 ]
Dalovic, Ivica [2 ]
Prasad, P. V. Vara [3 ]
Farooq, Muhammad [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Korczyk-Szabo, Joanna [1 ]
Kovacik, Peter [8 ]
Simansky, Vladimir [9 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Sustainable Agr & Herbol, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
[2] Natl Inst Republ Serbia, Inst Field & Vegetable Crops, Maxim Gorki 30, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Agr & Marine Sci, Dept Plant Sci, Al Khoud 123, Oman
[5] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
[6] Univ Western Australia, UWA Inst Agr, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[7] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Environm, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[8] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Agrochem & Plant Nutr, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
[9] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Soil Sci, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
conventional tillage; fertilization; field pea; minimum tillage; soil quality; yield; DRY PEA; NITROGEN-FIXATION; SOIL; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; PHOSPHORUS; LEGUMES;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10111728
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weather, tillage, and fertilization are the major factors affecting the grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). However, the impact of tillage and fertilization on yield is not well understood. Therefore, this experiment was initiated in 1999. In this manuscript, we report the data recorded during the period of 2011-2015 to quantify the impacts on yield. Field peas were planted in seedbeds prepared through conventional tillage (CT)-moldboard ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; and minimum tillage (MT)-disking to the depth of 0.12 m. The crop received three fertilization treatments, including zero fertilization (control); nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) mineral fertilization treatment; and NPK mineral fertilization plus the incorporation of pre-crop biomass. Five years' average data indicated the highest yield on fertilized treatments (2.85-2.98 t ha(-1) vs. 2.66 t ha(-1)) regardless of the tillage. When comparing the yield of fertilized treatments, the yield under CT (2.98 t ha(-1)) was significantly higher than that of MT (2.85 t ha(-1)). However, on non-fertilized treatments (less fertile plots), a higher yield was recorded under MT (2.71 t ha(-1)) compared with CT (2.40 t ha(-1)). Overall, the results of this study suggest that fertilizer application together with incorporation of the above-ground biomass of the previous crop may help sustain pea grain yield.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GENETIC STUDIES IN RELATION TO YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Punia, S. S.
    Ram, Baldev
    Koli, N. R.
    Ranwha, B. R.
    Maloo, S. R.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (02) : 98 - 104
  • [42] Analysis of genetic architect of yield and its component in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Salam, J. L.
    Kashyap, O. P.
    Pandey, R. L.
    Nag, S. K.
    Ranjan, S. K.
    PLANT ARCHIVES, 2007, 7 (01): : 229 - 231
  • [43] Growth, Yield and Economics of Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) as Influenced by Phosphorus and Bio-fertilizers under Subtropical Conditions of Jammu
    Bhat, Tauseef A.
    Gupta, Meenakshi
    Mandi, S. Sheraz
    Ganai, Manzoor A.
    Bhat, Hilal A.
    Bhat, J. A.
    Wani, Iqbal A.
    Dar, M. Hussain
    JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 7 (01) : 645 - 652
  • [44] ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF SALICYLIC ACID ON THE YIELD AND THE YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF PISUM SATIVUM L. UNDER FLUORIDE STRESS
    Ahmed, Shakil
    Karamat, Maryam
    Haider, Azeem
    Ahmad, M. Nauman
    Jabeen, Fareeha
    Ansari, Madeeha
    FLUORIDE, 2021, 54 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [45] Effect of Phosphorus Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on the Yield, Nodulation and Nutrient Uptake in Field Pea (Pisum sativum sp arvense L.)
    Erman, Murat
    Yildirim, Bunyamin
    Togay, Necat
    Cig, Fatih
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2009, 8 (02): : 301 - 304
  • [46] COMPARING EFFECTS OF LOW LEVELS OF HERBICIDES ON GREENHOUSE- AND FIELD-GROWN POTATOES (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.), SOYBEANS (GLYCINE MAX L.), AND PEAS (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Pfleeger, Thomas
    Olszyk, David
    Lee, E. Henry
    Plocher, Milton
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2011, 30 (02) : 455 - 468
  • [47] EFFECT OF HARVESTING REGIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON THE FIELD PEA (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) AGRONOMIC TRAITS
    Krizmanic, G.
    Cupic, T.
    Tucak, M.
    Popovic, S.
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2015, 21 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [48] THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SOWING TIMES ON THE PHENOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SEED YIELD OF THE PEA (Pisum sativum L.)
    Oncan Sumer, Feride
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2023, 28 (02) : 301 - 312
  • [49] Ovule abortion and seed set of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown under high temperature
    Osorio, Evelyn
    Davis, Arthur R.
    Warkentin, Thomas D.
    Bueckert, Rosalind A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 103 (03) : 270 - 284
  • [50] Study of Heterosis for Seed Yield and its Contributing Traits in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Singh, Manender
    Malik, Sunil
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Kumar, Sanjiv
    Dev, Pavitra
    Kumar, Vinuj
    VEGETOS, 2012, 25 (01): : 184 - 189