The Influence of Different Fertilization Strategies on the Grain Yield of Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.) under Conventional and Conservation Tillage

被引:14
|
作者
Macak, Milan [1 ]
Candrakova, Eva [1 ]
Dalovic, Ivica [2 ]
Prasad, P. V. Vara [3 ]
Farooq, Muhammad [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Korczyk-Szabo, Joanna [1 ]
Kovacik, Peter [8 ]
Simansky, Vladimir [9 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Sustainable Agr & Herbol, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
[2] Natl Inst Republ Serbia, Inst Field & Vegetable Crops, Maxim Gorki 30, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Agr & Marine Sci, Dept Plant Sci, Al Khoud 123, Oman
[5] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
[6] Univ Western Australia, UWA Inst Agr, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[7] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Environm, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[8] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Agrochem & Plant Nutr, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
[9] Slovak Univ Agr, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Dept Soil Sci, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
conventional tillage; fertilization; field pea; minimum tillage; soil quality; yield; DRY PEA; NITROGEN-FIXATION; SOIL; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; PHOSPHORUS; LEGUMES;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10111728
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weather, tillage, and fertilization are the major factors affecting the grain yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L.). However, the impact of tillage and fertilization on yield is not well understood. Therefore, this experiment was initiated in 1999. In this manuscript, we report the data recorded during the period of 2011-2015 to quantify the impacts on yield. Field peas were planted in seedbeds prepared through conventional tillage (CT)-moldboard ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; and minimum tillage (MT)-disking to the depth of 0.12 m. The crop received three fertilization treatments, including zero fertilization (control); nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) mineral fertilization treatment; and NPK mineral fertilization plus the incorporation of pre-crop biomass. Five years' average data indicated the highest yield on fertilized treatments (2.85-2.98 t ha(-1) vs. 2.66 t ha(-1)) regardless of the tillage. When comparing the yield of fertilized treatments, the yield under CT (2.98 t ha(-1)) was significantly higher than that of MT (2.85 t ha(-1)). However, on non-fertilized treatments (less fertile plots), a higher yield was recorded under MT (2.71 t ha(-1)) compared with CT (2.40 t ha(-1)). Overall, the results of this study suggest that fertilizer application together with incorporation of the above-ground biomass of the previous crop may help sustain pea grain yield.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimation of correlation coefficient among yield and attributing traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Singh, Sandeep Kumar
    Singh, Vinit Pratap
    Srivastava, Seweta
    Singh, Amresh Kumar
    Chaubey, Brijesh Kumar
    Srivastava, R. K.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2018, 41 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [32] Effect of plant types on grain yield and lodging resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Singh, A. K.
    Srivastava, C. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2015, 75 (01) : 69 - 74
  • [33] NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT FIELD PEA GENOTYPES (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
    Rodrigues, A. M.
    Reis, C. M. G.
    Rodrigues, P. J.
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2012, 18 (04): : 571 - 577
  • [34] Evaluation of yield stability of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) mutant lines
    Naidenova, N.
    Vassilevska-Ivanova, R.
    Kraptchev, B.
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2007, 60 (03): : 309 - 314
  • [35] Apparent and true total tract digestibility of phosphorus in field peas (Pisum sativum L.) by growing pigs
    Stein, H. H.
    Boersma, M. G.
    Pedersen, C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (04) : 523 - 525
  • [36] Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and plant density improve grain yield, nodulation capacity, and profitability of peas (Pisum sativum L.) on ferralsols in eastern DR Congo
    Chuma, Geant Basimine
    Mulalisi, Blaise
    Mondo, Jean Mubalama
    Ndeko, Adrien Byamungu
    Bora, Francine Safina
    Bagula, Espoir Mukengere
    Mushagalusa, Gustave Nachigera
    Civava, Rene
    CABI AGRICULTURE & BIOSCIENCE, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [37] The effects of thermal treatment of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) on nutrient and energy digestibility growing pigs
    Stein, H. H.
    Bohlke, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 (06) : 1424 - 1431
  • [38] Performance of Different Varieties of Spring Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Irrigated and Rainfed Environments in North China
    Yang, Xiaoming
    Yang, Jingyi
    He, Yuhua
    Zong, Xuxiao
    Min, Gengmei
    Lian, Rongfang
    Liu, Zhenxing
    Xiang, Chao
    Li, Ling
    Xing, Baolong
    Zhang, Lijuan
    Gou, Zhiwen
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [39] Evaluation of the Potential of Peas (Pisum sativum L.) to Be Used in Selenium Biofortification Programs Under Mediterranean Conditions
    María J. Poblaciones
    Sara M. Rodrigo
    Oscar Santamaría
    Biological Trace Element Research, 2013, 151 : 132 - 137
  • [40] Maximization of Nutrient use Efficiency and Yield through Application of Biofertilizers in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Singh, R. K.
    Singh, S. R. K.
    Kumar, Narendra
    Singh, A. K.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2023, 46 (11) : 1475 - 1482