Spatio-Temporal Evaluation of Water Storage Trends from Hydrological Models over Australia Using GRACE Mascon Solutions

被引:30
作者
Yang, Xinchun [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Siyuan [3 ]
Feng, Wei [4 ]
Ran, Jiangjun [5 ]
You, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Zhongshan [1 ]
Gong, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Environm Engn, Chengdu 611756, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & Resource, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Precis Measurement Sci & Technol, Inst Geodesy & Geophys, State Key Lab Geodesy & Earths Dynam, Wuhan 430077, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GRACE mascon solutions; hydrological models; performance evaluation; trend difference in different water storage; SOIL-MOISTURE; MASS VARIATIONS; VARIABILITY; GROUNDWATER; ANOMALIES; GRAVITY; BASIN; ASSIMILATION; RESOURCES; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.3390/rs12213578
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data have been extensively used to evaluate the total terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA) from hydrological models. However, which individual water storage components (i.e., soil moisture storage anomalies (SMSA) or groundwater water storage anomalies (GWSA)) cause the discrepancies in TWSA between GRACE and hydrological models have not been thoroughly investigated or quantified. In this study, we applied GRACE mass concentration block (mascon) solutions to evaluate the spatio-temporal TWSA trends (2003-2014) from seven prevailing hydrological models (i.e., Noah-3.6, Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM-F2.5), Variable Infiltration Capacity macroscale model (VIC-4.1.2), Water-Global Assessment and Prognosis (WaterGAP-2.2d), PCRaster Global Water Balance (PCR-GLOBWB-2), Community Land Model (CLM-4.5), and Australian Water Resources Assessment Landscape model (AWRA-L v6)) in Australia and, more importantly, identified which individual water storage components lead to the differences in TWSA trends between GRACE and hydrological models. The results showed that all of the hydrological models employed in this study, except for CLM-4.5 model, underestimated the GRACE-derived TWSA trends. These underestimations can be divided into three categories: (1) ignoring GWSA, e.g., Noah-3.6 and VIC-4.1.2 models; (2) underrating both SMSA and GWSA, e.g., CLSM-F2.5, WaterGAP-2.2d, and PCR-GLOBWB-2 models; (3) deficiently modeling GWSA, e.g., AWRA-L v6 model. In comparison, CLM-4.5 model yielded the best agreement with GRACE but overstated the GRACE-derived TWSA trends due to the overestimation of GWSA. Our results underscore that GRACE mascon solutions can be used as a valuable and efficient validation dataset to evaluate the spatio-temporal performance of hydrological models. Confirming which individual water storage components result in the discrepancies in TWSA between GRACE and hydrological models can better assist in further hydrological model development.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [51] On the use of the GRACE normal equation of inter-satellite tracking data for estimation of soil moisture and groundwater in Australia
    Tangdamrongsub, Natthachet
    Han, Shin-Chan
    Decker, Mark
    Yeo, In-Young
    Kim, Hyungjun
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (03) : 1811 - 1829
  • [52] GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system
    Tapley, BD
    Bettadpur, S
    Ries, JC
    Thompson, PF
    Watkins, MM
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5683) : 503 - 505
  • [53] Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change
    Tapley, Byron D.
    Watkins, Michael M.
    Flechtner, Frank
    Reigber, Christoph
    Bettadpur, Srinivas
    Rodell, Matthew
    Sasgen, Ingo
    Famiglietti, James S.
    Landerer, Felix W.
    Chambers, Don P.
    Reager, John T.
    Gardner, Alex S.
    Save, Himanshu
    Ivins, Erik R.
    Swenson, Sean C.
    Boening, Carmen
    Dahle, Christoph
    Wiese, David N.
    Dobslaw, Henryk
    Tamisiea, Mark E.
    Velicogna, Isabella
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (05) : 358 - 369
  • [54] Improved water balance component estimates through joint assimilation of GRACE water storage and SMOS soil moisture retrievals
    Tian, Siyuan
    Tregoning, Paul
    Renzullo, Luigi J.
    van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.
    Walker, Jeffrey P.
    Pauwels, Valentijn R. N.
    Allgeyer, Sebastien
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (03) : 1820 - 1840
  • [55] Tregoning P., 2012, Assessment of GRACE Satellites for Groundwater Estimation in Australia, P82
  • [56] GRACE estimates of sea surface height anomalies in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia
    Tregoning, Paul
    Lambeck, Kurt
    Ramillien, Guillaume
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 271 (1-4) : 241 - 244
  • [57] A comparison of annual vertical crustal displacements from GPS and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) over Europe
    van Dam, T.
    Wahr, J.
    Lavallee, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2007, 112 (B3)
  • [58] Use of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment terrestrial water storage retrievals to evaluate model estimates by the Australian water resources assessment system
    van Dijk, A. I. J. M.
    Renzullo, L. J.
    Rodell, M.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [59] The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001-2009): Natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society
    van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.
    Beck, Hylke E.
    Crosbie, Russell S.
    de Jeu, Richard A. M.
    Liu, Yi Y.
    Podger, Geoff M.
    Timbal, Bertrand
    Viney, Neil R.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (02) : 1040 - 1057
  • [60] What Is the Spatial Resolution of grace Satellite Products for Hydrology?
    Vishwakarma, Bramha Dutt
    Devaraju, Balaji
    Sneeuw, Nico
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (06)